Millions of faithful Catholic Church’s object of adoration. This is it! (Exodus 20:4 & 5).

 (…continued from part two…)

III.           She was not spiritually attached to the Lord of glory. Weak, spiritually, she was. The pointer to her weakness is found in John 19:26 & 27, When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son! 27) Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home. None heard Mary’s voice again. The maternal umbilical cord had been discarded. It is not in congruity with divine protocol. What did Mary, whose parturient matrix engendered the biological incarnation of the Lord’s earthly sojourn, say even on the day of the epical Day of Pentecost? Nothing! The Church is never about the femininity of her persona. The word ‘mother,’ in Luke and John is meter (may’-tare) ‘a “mother” {literally or figuratively, immediate or remote};’ and ‘brethren’ is adelphos.                                                                                                                                                            

                One of the scriptural bizarreness of Catholicism is the cultic mother-and-child established indoctrination. Quite a paganistic occultism. This is a Nimrodic (or Nimro-semiramic) importation of paganism into the Church of Jesus. Nowhere in Scripture is it (mother-and-child) found. This is an apodeictic representation of Nimrodic Baal worship of his wife, Semiramis, and Tammuz their son, whose deified stance concludes the apish trinitarian concept of Baalism. Satanism conspiracy took it from Babel to Egypt, the next global world power. There, in Egypt, the mother and child assumed the sobriquet of Isis and Horus. Is it not over two thousand years ago? How could the baby Jesus still remain a baby? Catholicism should tell me, in fact, us, when that baby of Madonna will be weaned!                                                                                                                                                   In Egypt, Semiramis became known as “Isis”, “The Queen of Heaven.” Nimrod became known as “Osiris”, the husband/son, and frequently called “Horus” (the sun god). In Phoenicia, Semiramis and Nimrod were worshipped as or known as Ashterath and Tammuz or EL, BACCHUS, ASTARTE; in Greece, Aphrodite and Eros or ZEUS, DIONYSUS, APHRODITE; in Rome, Venus and Cupid or JUPITER, ATTIS, CYBELE, DIANA, and in China, Mother Shing Moo and her child.

 Indulgence of talismanic proclivity of Catholicism!

Here is a chart to show how Nimrod, Tammuz and Semiramis has been handed down.

1. Nimrod Lord of Heaven

2. Tammuz ‘The Pagan Messiah’

3. Semiramis ‘The Queen of Heaven’

Lebanon – Baal, Tammuz, Ashtoreth

 BABYLON – Belus, Tammuz, Rhea, Ishtar

ASSYRIA – Ninus, Hercules, Beltis

 EGYPT – Ra, Osiris, Horus, Isis, Hathor

INDIA – Vishnu, Krishna, Isi, Devaki

CHINA – Pan-Ku, Yi, Heng-o, Ma Tsoopo

MEXICO – Teotl, Quetzalcoatl, Coattlicue

Scandinavian – Odin, Balder, Fregg, Freyda

Note: As you can see by the chart above, Satan has started his counterfeit religion in Babel.

SEMIRAMIS or Ashtarte NIMROD or Baal the sun god

Cybele (Goddess Mother) Asia Deoius (Asia)

Fortuna (Pagan Rome) The Boy Jupiter (Pagan Rome)

Venus (Rome) Cupid (Rome)

Ashterath (Phoenicia) Tammuz (Phoenicia)

Aphrodite (Greece) Eros (Greece)

Irene (Goddess of Peace) Greece The Boy Plutus (Greece)

Ishtar (Babylon) The Winged One (Babylon)

Rhea (Mother of Gods) Orion (Constellation)

Diana (Ephesian) Bacchus (God of Party going) of Ancient Greece

Shing Moo (Holy Mother of China).                                                                                                                                  

Unholy syncretism

 Unholy syncretism

                With these overwhelming facts that connects the Mary of Catholicism with Semiramis, the Papacy of the Romish church continues, without any prick of conscience, to extol the unscriptural deistic virtues of the biblical Mary. This tells me something. There is no iota of doubt in my mind that the Romish Catholicism knows what she is doing. They are deliberately serving the Nimrosemiramic deities! Period!                                                                                                                                                            The Book of Jeremiah 7:18 reads: “The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.” Here is JFB’s Commentary on Jeremiah 7:18 children . . . fathers . . . womenNot merely isolated individuals practised idolatry; young and old, men and women, and whole families, contributed their joint efforts to promote it. Oh, that there were the same zeal for the worship of God as there is for error (Jer 44:17; Jer 44:19; Jer 19:13 (refs3)).                                                                                                                                                        

cakes . . . queen of heavenCakes were made of honey, fine flour, c., in a round flat shape to resemble the disc of the moon, to which they were offered. Others read as Margin, “the frame of heaven,” that is, the planets generally so the Septuagint here; but elsewhere the Septuagint translates, “queen of heaven.” The Phoelignicians called the moon Ashtoreth or Astarte: the wife of Baal or Moloch, the king of heaven. The male and female pair of deities symbolized the generative powers of nature; hence arose the introduction of prostitution in the worship. The Babylonians worshipped Ashtoreth as Mylitta, that is, generative. Our Monday, or Moon-day, indicates the former prevalence of moon worship (see on Isa 65:11).

that they may provoke me—implying design: in worshipping strange gods they seemed as if purposely to provoke Jehovah.‘ 

(…to be continued…)

 NB= I’d very much love to read your candid contributions. Thank you!

Read part two here

An Ambassador (For Christ or Lucifer) -2nd part



(Continued from the 1st part)   The truth is that when you use falsity to teach Jesus Christ you will definitely expose yourself with your very stance. Mariolatry points so effortlessly to Prophet Jeremiah’s condemnation of ‘the queen of heaven’ in Jeremiah 7:18; 44:17-19; 44:25 and Pauline allusion to the terrible jealousy of God we ignite by this sinful act in 1Corinthians 10:22, “Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he?” This incorrigible opiumism of Catholicism to Mariology leaves us no room but to understand who her ambassadorial missiology rightly serves. It may be of interest to note that this ‘queen of heaven’ is a religious reference to the moon. The demonic entity behind it is Ashtoreth or Astarte, the wife of Baal (sun god). Understand also that the first man to lead the earthly propagation of idolatry after the great deluge was Nimrod, who was worshipped as bel or baal and as the sun god. His wife, Semiramis was the one the Phoelignician worshippers called the moon i.e. Ashtoreth or Astarte: the wife of Baal or Moloch, the king of heaven. To them the male and female pair of deities symbolized the generative (most probably where Illuminati get their ‘G’ symbol) powers of nature; hence arose the introduction of prostitution in the worship.

The Babylonians worshipped Ashtoreth as Mylitta, that is, generative. Our Monday, or Moon-day, indicates the former prevalence of moon worship and the Bible says in Isaiah 65:11, “But ye are they that forsake the LORD, that forget my holy mountain, that prepare a table for that troop, and that furnish the drink offering unto that number”. Talk about concupiscence, maybe it is the spirit of Astarte that accounts for priests’ randiness. The invocation of Mary as the mediatrix certainly exhumes and imports an unscriptural Semiramis into Christianity. It is as simple as that. Was it the Holy Spirit that told the Pope to carry out an expunction of the second commandment in an expurgatory exercise? Definitely the 2nd law of, “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: v. 5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me” [Exodus 20:4-5]; is offensive to Romish indoctrinating penchant love for the adoration of artwork. Apostolic Succession is another scriptural anomaly from Catholicism. If they teach that every Pope is a successor of Peter, who succeeded Paul, Matthew, James, Bartholomew, John, Thaddeus, Philip and the other apostles, or are they not apostles of the Lord Jesus?

170px-canonization_2014-_the_canonization_of_saint_john_xxii  Pope Francis


The Pope, as the head of the Roman Catholic Church, is often called the “Holy Father” and the “Vicar of Christ”. These titles and roles only find an application to God. As “Holy Father”, he is God the Father or Christ (as found in Isaiah 9:6). “Vicar of Christ” makes the pope Christ (as coming from the Father) or the Holy Spirit (the Comforter). This guy is calling himself God, the Creator, just as others before him! He claims the ability to speak ex cathedra, which implies that the pope exercises a Godlike infallibility which enables him to add to and augment Scripture. What! I am flabbergasted, overwhelmed and completely nonplussed at the reckless impunity with which Catholicism treats the Word of God, well maybe no pope ever read Revelation 22:18-20, where we have in the 18th verse, “For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book”.

The word ‘testify’ contextually is different from the ‘testifieth’ of the 20th verse. Testify is summartureō (soom-mar-too-reh’-o): ‘to testify jointly, that is, corroborate by (concurrent) evidence’. This summartureō is applied to John as an ambassador for Christ. ‘Testifieth’ of the 20th verse is martureō (mar-too-reh’-o): ‘to be a witness, that is, testify (literally or figuratively)’. Martureō in this context is in connection with the true or original Testifier Himself, the Word of God, even the Lord Jesus. The Roman Catholic Pope wields unbiblical and unholy authority over his followers, usurping the headship of Christ and perverting the work of the Holy Spirit.


Charles Taze Russell of Jehovah’s Witness

All that Jehovah’s Witness sect saw in the Bible is the Book of 1Thessalonians 4:16, “For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first”; to make an angelic conclusion of Christ. The title, ‘Lord’ in Greek is kurios (koo’-ree-os): ‘From κυρος kuros (supremacy); supreme in authority, that is, (as noun) controller’. This is a Greek title very similar to the Hebrew ‘Jehovah’. “For the Lord himself shall descend…” is an emphatic statement of God intimation. The word ‘shout’ is keleuma (kel’-yoo-mah): ‘a cry of incitement, an order, command, spec. a stimulating cry, either that by which animals are roused and urged on by man, as horses by charioteers, hounds by hunters etc.’. The Lord Jesus gives an order and the archangel (possibly, Michael) responds with a ‘voice’ which is phōnē (fo-nay’): ‘through the idea of disclosure; ‘a tone (articulate, bestial or artificial); by implication an address (for any purpose), saying or language’. The archangel echoes the Lord’s command. Two people (The Lord and His creature) verbalize the same thing. Charles Taze Russell either did not understand or just wanted to teach the wrong doctrine. Russell taught that the Holy Spirit was just an inanimate intangibility and that the doctrine of the Trinity is of the occult. (…to be continued…)

Read 1st part by clicking here