TRUE PICTURE OF THE WORLD (3)


(…continued from part two…)

3)            Man is of sinfulness. God expects man to forsake the label of ruination hanging on his neck. He must receive Jesus as Lord and Saviour because that is Who Jesus is –the Saviour of this cursed world. Jesus said, “For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, 39) And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be [Matthew 24:38-39].

                Is the true picture of the present world not of a derailment? Can anyone dine with the Devil and not be wallowing in the soil of the blood of the innocent? It is not possible to be an Apostle of evil and not to have tasted of an iniquitous initiation. Opposed to: love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith. Meekness, temperance (the fruits of the Spirit of God –Galatians 5:22) are these: adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness. Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies. Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings (Galatians 5:20-21) –all proclivities of the flesh.  

                Very few live on the fruits of the Spirit. The tumultuous whole lot, that luxuriate in wanton gourmadism of satanic delectation of Galatians 5:20-21, will prove their state of being in their activities. The poisonous vulgarity from their lips must utter the taboo words of ‘sh’ and ‘f’ words. Is there any Hollywood movie that does not script these words of putrefaction into the mouths of their star actors? Semiramic evolutions of Diana, Venus, Aphrodite, Isis and many others promoted prostitution as a ritual, in the assemblage of religious worship. Illicit sex is, no doubt, the thing of the present world. It is viewed as having fun. What do they call fornication? “Making love,” they will assert. This is what the Bible, in Galatians 5:20, calls ‘fornication’ in Greek: porneia (por-nei’-ah), defined as: ‘1. prostitution (including adultery, incest, and porn) 2. (by extension) unwedded stimulation or fulfillment of sexual desire 3. (figuratively) idolatry.’ Fornication is strictly a pornographic issue.

Objects of prostitution

                Sex business is one of the most thriving illicit ventures of human degradation. A virgin, ergo, is ungraciously mocked for being so unexposed to quotidian ‘goodness.’ Sex between an unmarried couple is quite idolatrous. How? God invented sex for the legal couple. Any deviation is anti-God. Any anti-Jehovah tendency is of the Devil. Sex is therefore spiritual. Sex before a legal marriage is an adoration of the initiator of Satanism. A much more phenomenal one is that of homosexualism and its feminine lesbianism. Egregious absurdity.

Behold the Bride of Christ!

                The woman is Christ’s bride. The one whose original sin is completely forgiven. Having taken the woman, whose sole desire is to please Him who has called her out of the darkness of Satanism, the woman’s Lord, Saviour and God is Jesus Christ. Adamic reality is only of two sexes; one (the woman) has said, “Yes, I do!” This marriage to the Lamb necessitates an engenderment of latria. Lucifer has one opium of extreme desideration: to be worshipped. To receive this divine established phenomenon, the Devil must marry. A natural marriage must involve a couple, one a male and the other a female. The LORD God, preeminently has got the woman. Perplexed, Lucifer obstinately goes for the only available ‘male’ (Cain). This is the birth of homosexuality.

Longing; lust for what is forbidden: homosexualism.

                Let us begin this homosexual stuff with 1Thessalonians 4:5 Not in the lust of concupiscence, even as the Gentiles which know not God: where the word ‘lust’ is pathos (path’-os) ‘1. (properly) suffering (“pathos”) 2. (subjectively) a passion (especially sexual lust);’ and ‘concupiscence’ is epithumia (ep-ee-thoo-mee’-ah) meaning: ‘1. a longing 2. (especially) a lust for what is forbidden.’ Colossians 3:5 says, Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: and what does ‘inordinate affection’ denote? It is the above ‘pathos.’

From Babylon to Egypt idolatrously

                Why is pathos an act of ‘idolatry,’ the Greek of which is eidololatreia (ei-do-lol-at-rei’-ah) ‘image-worship?’ Eidololatreia is made of two words: Eidolon (ei’-do-lon) ‘1. an image, idol (i.e. for worship) 2. (by implication) a heathen god 3. (plural) the worship of such.’ The second is latreia (lat-rei’-ah) ‘ministration of God, i.e. worship.’ Idolatry is a religious malposition. The wickedness of idolatry is borne out of the fact that it is offered solely to Lucifer, Jehovah’s archenemy. Inordinate sex leads the participants in satanic worship –scripturally speaking.

Homosexuality: who’s the wife & who’s the husband?

                Romans 1:26-28 remain the scriptural pointer to the diabolism of homosexuality. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27) And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 28) And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient.”

                Get born again by saying this simple prayer.

“Dear heavenly Father, I come to You now in the name of Jesus Christ. I believe in my heart that Jesus is the Son of God. I believe that Jesus died on the cross for my sin. I believe that You raised Him from the dead. I confess with my mouth that Jesus is Lord and I receive Him now as my Lord and my Saviour. I give God all the glory. Amen!”

(…to be continued…)

Part two is here; click

Read part four here

Fashion sense or nonsense? The crazier the better!

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (VII)

Zachariah, Elizabeth, Joseph, Mary and baby Jesus.

VII.         I saw this in a Wikipedia post, “According to the apocryphal Gospel of James, Mary was the daughter of Saint Joachim and Saint Anne. Before Mary’s conception, Anne had been barren and was far advanced in years. Mary was given to service as a consecrated virgin in the Temple in Jerusalem when she was three years old, much like Hannah took Samuel to the Tabernacle as recorded in the Old Testament. Some apocryphal accounts, continued the post, state that at the time of her betrothal to Joseph, Mary was 12–14 years old, and he was ninety years old, but such accounts are unreliable.  According to ancient Jewish custom, Mary could have been betrothed at about 12. Hyppolitus of Thebes claims that Mary lived for 11 years after the death of her son Jesus, dying in 41 AD.                                                        

Transubstantiation of 1215

                “The earliest extant biographical writing on Mary is Life of the Virgin attributed to the 7th-century saint, Maximus the Confessor, which portrays her as a key element of the early Christian Church after the death of Jesus.”    

An Apocrypha is devoid of biblical canonization, ergo, cannot be relied on to serve as God’s protocol.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

                This is the genealogy of Mary. According to the writer of Luke, Mary was a relative of Elizabeth, wife of the priest, Zechariah of the priestly division of Abijah, who was herself part of the lineage of Aaron and so of the tribe of Levi [Luke 1:5; 1:36]. Mary’s relationship with Elizabeth was probably on the maternal side. Joseph, to whom she was betrothed, was of the royal House of David and so of the Tribe of Judah. The genealogy of Jesus presented in Luke 3 from Nathan, third son of David and Bathsheba, is in fact the genealogy of Mary, while the genealogy from Solomon given in Matthew chapter 1 is that of Joseph.

 Nimrod the sun god (stars) up, Semiramis the moon below.

Mariological Titles:

*Life-giving Spring It will certainly take a wickedly fudged scripture to get God’s Bible to validate this title. Does Mary boast coevality with the Trinity? Why would Catholics not kneel in idolisation before the sculptured work of Madonna? She is a life-giving spring after all!

*Our Mother the Holy Virgin This one is supposed to be taken from John 19:27, “Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.” Most certainly, the Romish church knows how to mangle scripture to suit the cravings of Catholicism. If Mary were to be the spiritual matriarch that Catholicism is unsuccessfully trying to establish, then, John would have to be the one to follow his holy, perpetual virgin mother home, and not the vice versa.

*The Queen who is by the Right Side of the King. Is Psalm 45:9 a couch in reference to Mary? “Kings’ daughters were among thy honourable women: upon thy right hand did stand the queen in gold of Ophir” [Psalm 45:9]. Is this Mary, Madonna or the Church (the Bride of Jesus)? This is certainly the CHURCH! Except for a wickedly distortion of rhema, there is nowhere in scripture where an individual is married to the Lamb! If Mary, the daughter of Jacob and the mother of Jesus were to be a queen in the celestial assizes, then, she must have a throne in the third heaven of the Almighty Jehovah.                                                                                      

 Who are these young angelic beings? Cupidity of baby angels?

                A mother knows the beginning of the life of the fruit of her matrix. This makes her biologically more advanced in age than the unborn foetus. Is there any infinitesimal inference to Marian maternity of God in Simon Peter’s Holy Spirit’s inspired scriptural transcriptions? A mother will always be older than her progeny even if she dies at age fifty and her son goes on to clock the hundredth year in his own life time. No wonder Goddess Madonna continues to clutch on to Baby God! She is older than the Ancient of days! That, Pope Francis (if you care to know), is the implications of your Christokos! Your false declarations make Mary the mother of the One who has neither beginning nor ending. Had your Madonna been before the beginlessness of the Ancient of days? Does she have the capacity of eternity to containerise the Self-Existing, Eternal, Holy One of Israel? Impossible!

                Let the Pope show me Mary’s maternity and throne of Madonna in heaven. Jesus said, “And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also” [John 14:3]. And where is the place of Jesus at the celestial throne? “And Jesus said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven” [Mark 14:62]. At the right hand of God’s throne. These following verses do corroborate: Psalm 110:1; Matthew 22:44; Mark 16:19; Acts 2:34; Acts 7:55; Acts 7:56; Romans 8:34; Ephesians 1:20; Ephesians 4:8; Colossians 3:1; Hebrews 1:3; Hebrews 8:1; Hebrews 12:2; 1Peter 3:22.  

  (…to be continued…)

  NB= I’d very much love to read your candid contributions. Thank you!

Read part 6 here

Click to read part 8

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (VI)

Nowhere does the Bible support the emblematic holiness of the halo

 (…continued from part five…)

VI.          Mariology in the 19th century was dominated by discussions about the dogmatic definition of the Immaculate Conception and the First Vatican Council. In 1854, Pope Pius IX, with the support of the overwhelming majority of Roman Catholic Bishops, whom he had consulted between the years of 1851–1853, proclaimed the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, which had been a traditional belief among the faithful for centuries.                                                                                                                                                                  On 8 May, during the First Vatican Council, a majority of the fathers voted to reject making the Assumption a dogma, a position shared by Pope Pius IX. In its support, Council fathers highlighted the divine motherhood of Mary and called her the mother of all graces. In 1950, the dogma of the Assumption of Mary received an encyclical from Pope Pius XII. The Second Vatican Council spoke of Mary as Mother of the Church. In 1988 Pope John Paul II stated that the Second Vatican Council confirmed that: “unless one looks to the Mother of God, it is impossible to understand the mystery of the Church.” In 2002 in the Apostolic letter Rosarium Virginis Mariae he emphasized the importance of the rosary as a key devotion for all Catholics and added the Luminous Mysteries to the rosary.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

                Pope Benedict XVI continued the program of redirection of the Catholic Church towards a Marian focus and stated: “Let us carry on and imitate Mary, a deeply Eucharistic soul, and our lives will become a Magnificat”. In 2008 Pope Benedict XVI introduced a Marian prayer he had composed, which referring to Mary being the Mother of all Christians stated: “you became, in a new way, the Mother of all those who receive your Son Jesus in faith and choose to follow in his footsteps…”                             

Quite a scatological mind of an individual it will take to disdain the faith and exemplary character of Mary, the mother of Jesus; but when one peruses the Pauline hall of faith (Hebrews chapter eleven), Mary is not accorded a mentioning, neither as the Catholicism engendered ‘mother of God.’ The Holy Spirit did not even direct Paul to do an insertion of her name somewhere in-between verses 39 & 40 to produce a couching like: “God having provided some better thing for us, through the divine matrix of Madonna of the blessed perpetuity of virginity, that they without us should not be made perfect.”  Mary, to Catholicism, would have been the co-Perfecter of the faith of Christians if Hebrews eleven has an inclusion of her name.                                                                                                     

Guess what the halo behind Mary means? Semiramis, the moon goddess, of course!

                Madonna, a Catholicism epithet of Mary, the mother of Jesus, is defined as ‘my Lady.’ Lord, as the masculinity of lady, makes Madonna something else. In the spiritual ritualism of religiosity the lordship of any personage is deistic. The title of Madonna, ergo, is a Papal acquiescence of Mary’s sacerdotal worship. Lacking Scriptural knowledge, it is quite obvious why Catholicism will embark on a vitiation of Exodus 20:3 to bring the knees of Catholic faithful members bowed before the statue of Mary.                                                                                                                                                    How could the supposed ‘mother of God’ betray such imperfection seen in Luke 2:41-50? “And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father’s business” [Luke 2:49]? The humanity of the twelve-year old Jesus did not only debunk Catholic’s counterfactual, “Hail Mary full of grace, the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, mother of God: pray for us sinners now and in the hour of death;” He questioned His mother’s spiritual bankruptcy.                                                                                                                                                                     The papal Gregory the Great authorised the teaching of first two parts of Marian prayer in 1198, taken from Luke 1:28, 42. Pope Pius V added the third part in 1568. The true words of Luke 1:28 are “Hail, thou that art highly favoured,” which are translated in the Romish Vulgate as, “Ave gratia plena” (“Hail Mary full of grace”), the catechism means that, Mary is full of gifts of grace and on account of this she exists between God and mankind as the mediator to dispense gifts. Mariolatry! The only One who of Scripture is termed ‘full of grace’ is Jesus in John 1:14, And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.” This is the only place, in Scripture, ‘full of grace’ appears, making it a hapax legomenon.

   Infant baptism? Romans 10:9-10?

                On the day of the naming of a new baby, the Roman Catholic Church priest washes the baby’s head which, to Catholic faithful, represents the Christian baptism. Whether it is ‘baptize, baptized, baptizing,’ the Greek word of which is baptizo (bap-tid’-zo): ‘1. to immerse, submerge 2. to make whelmed or soaked (i.e. fully wet)’ or ‘baptism,’ baptisma (bap’-tis-mah): ‘immersion (technically or figuratively),’ it is definitely of a total immersion in water by definition. One only goes for baptism after having been born again (Mark 16:15 &16). The Pope changed the baptismal doctrine to suit Catholicism. A baby, according to the soteriological formula of Romans 10:9, 10, cannot go through the rituals of this spiritual rejuvenation. As babes, Christ did die for them. I am wondering why a priest of Almighty Jehovah will continue to be christening Christian babies Cynthia or Diana, knowing fully well that it is paganistic through and through, being one of the sobriquets of Semiramis.        

(…to be continued…)                                                                                                                                           

NB= I’d very much love to read your candid contributions. Thank you!

Read part five. Click here.

CLICK HERE to read part seven.

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (III)

 Millions of faithful Catholic Church’s object of adoration. This is it! (Exodus 20:4 & 5).

 (…continued from part two…)

III.           She was not spiritually attached to the Lord of glory. Weak, spiritually, she was. The pointer to her weakness is found in John 19:26 & 27, When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son! 27) Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home. None heard Mary’s voice again. The maternal umbilical cord had been discarded. It is not in congruity with divine protocol. What did Mary, whose parturient matrix engendered the biological incarnation of the Lord’s earthly sojourn, say even on the day of the epical Day of Pentecost? Nothing! The Church is never about the femininity of her persona. The word ‘mother,’ in Luke and John is meter (may’-tare) ‘a “mother” {literally or figuratively, immediate or remote};’ and ‘brethren’ is adelphos.                                                                                                                                                            

                One of the scriptural bizarreness of Catholicism is the cultic mother-and-child established indoctrination. Quite a paganistic occultism. This is a Nimrodic (or Nimro-semiramic) importation of paganism into the Church of Jesus. Nowhere in Scripture is it (mother-and-child) found. This is an apodeictic representation of Nimrodic Baal worship of his wife, Semiramis, and Tammuz their son, whose deified stance concludes the apish trinitarian concept of Baalism. Satanism conspiracy took it from Babel to Egypt, the next global world power. There, in Egypt, the mother and child assumed the sobriquet of Isis and Horus. Is it not over two thousand years ago? How could the baby Jesus still remain a baby? Catholicism should tell me, in fact, us, when that baby of Madonna will be weaned!                                                                                                                                                   In Egypt, Semiramis became known as “Isis”, “The Queen of Heaven.” Nimrod became known as “Osiris”, the husband/son, and frequently called “Horus” (the sun god). In Phoenicia, Semiramis and Nimrod were worshipped as or known as Ashterath and Tammuz or EL, BACCHUS, ASTARTE; in Greece, Aphrodite and Eros or ZEUS, DIONYSUS, APHRODITE; in Rome, Venus and Cupid or JUPITER, ATTIS, CYBELE, DIANA, and in China, Mother Shing Moo and her child.

 Indulgence of talismanic proclivity of Catholicism!

Here is a chart to show how Nimrod, Tammuz and Semiramis has been handed down.

1. Nimrod Lord of Heaven

2. Tammuz ‘The Pagan Messiah’

3. Semiramis ‘The Queen of Heaven’

Lebanon – Baal, Tammuz, Ashtoreth

 BABYLON – Belus, Tammuz, Rhea, Ishtar

ASSYRIA – Ninus, Hercules, Beltis

 EGYPT – Ra, Osiris, Horus, Isis, Hathor

INDIA – Vishnu, Krishna, Isi, Devaki

CHINA – Pan-Ku, Yi, Heng-o, Ma Tsoopo

MEXICO – Teotl, Quetzalcoatl, Coattlicue

Scandinavian – Odin, Balder, Fregg, Freyda

Note: As you can see by the chart above, Satan has started his counterfeit religion in Babel.

SEMIRAMIS or Ashtarte NIMROD or Baal the sun god

Cybele (Goddess Mother) Asia Deoius (Asia)

Fortuna (Pagan Rome) The Boy Jupiter (Pagan Rome)

Venus (Rome) Cupid (Rome)

Ashterath (Phoenicia) Tammuz (Phoenicia)

Aphrodite (Greece) Eros (Greece)

Irene (Goddess of Peace) Greece The Boy Plutus (Greece)

Ishtar (Babylon) The Winged One (Babylon)

Rhea (Mother of Gods) Orion (Constellation)

Diana (Ephesian) Bacchus (God of Party going) of Ancient Greece

Shing Moo (Holy Mother of China).                                                                                                                                  

Unholy syncretism

 Unholy syncretism

                With these overwhelming facts that connects the Mary of Catholicism with Semiramis, the Papacy of the Romish church continues, without any prick of conscience, to extol the unscriptural deistic virtues of the biblical Mary. This tells me something. There is no iota of doubt in my mind that the Romish Catholicism knows what she is doing. They are deliberately serving the Nimrosemiramic deities! Period!                                                                                                                                                            The Book of Jeremiah 7:18 reads: “The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.” Here is JFB’s Commentary on Jeremiah 7:18 children . . . fathers . . . womenNot merely isolated individuals practised idolatry; young and old, men and women, and whole families, contributed their joint efforts to promote it. Oh, that there were the same zeal for the worship of God as there is for error (Jer 44:17; Jer 44:19; Jer 19:13 (refs3)).                                                                                                                                                        

cakes . . . queen of heavenCakes were made of honey, fine flour, c., in a round flat shape to resemble the disc of the moon, to which they were offered. Others read as Margin, “the frame of heaven,” that is, the planets generally so the Septuagint here; but elsewhere the Septuagint translates, “queen of heaven.” The Phoelignicians called the moon Ashtoreth or Astarte: the wife of Baal or Moloch, the king of heaven. The male and female pair of deities symbolized the generative powers of nature; hence arose the introduction of prostitution in the worship. The Babylonians worshipped Ashtoreth as Mylitta, that is, generative. Our Monday, or Moon-day, indicates the former prevalence of moon worship (see on Isa 65:11).

that they may provoke me—implying design: in worshipping strange gods they seemed as if purposely to provoke Jehovah.‘ 

(…to be continued…)

 NB= I’d very much love to read your candid contributions. Thank you!

Read part two here

LUCIFER’S DESIDERATION: God of gods (2)

 3dd00bb18795bfa72b535da7443707f0

     Satan lost the war in heaven: let’s make him lose here on earth.

Any religious organization that employs the symbolism of a circle, sun, moon or star could be a recruiting ground for satanic initiation. The halo and the star represent the sun, hence, Baal or Nimrod. The moon brings you down the altar of Semiramis, Venus, Diana, Artemis, Ashtoreth, Isis (you name it) it is the same wife of Nimrod. Satanism! Period!

satanic-pope-hexagram

Kabbalic symbol is the supposed “star of David.” Really? This is a monumental falsehood. When the LORD God wants to expose your wayward apostasy, He allows you to commit irreversible blunders. If they had called it ‘the star of Solomon’ maybe they could boast of a small point, in that King Solomon did commit apostasy, and he could have delved into occult practices. But David? As heinous some of his crimes were, he never committed apostasy. He knew his way back. Always. There is no scriptural basis for a ‘star of David.’ It has no Judaistic connection with Jehovah. Cabbala is global for Lucifer à la corrupted Judaism.

orthodox-skull

Czechoslovakian Catholics worship the skull of St. Vaclav

                 Roman Catholic professes Christianity. It is one billion, two hundred million globally strong. The first contumacious act of Catholicism against the scriptural truth is to make Peter its first Pope or Bishop. Peter’s apostleship was scripturally to the Jews. Romish Catholicism is strictly of the Gentiles. Again if they had made Paul, who happened to be the apostle of the Gentiles, as the first Pope that could score them a good point, maybe. The Romish Church loves art and in most cases will depict sacred individuals by placing a halo on their heads in works of art.

image002

Older Babylonian                       Egyptian                                     Catholicism

Purgatory. Just why this unscriptural indoctrination of purgatory when the Bible unequivocally teaches, “Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God” [John 3:3]? Baby Jesus must be tied to Mary, mother of God, queen of the saints, queen of the angels or much better still “queen of heaven!” (Jeremiah 44:17). Will this baby (Jesus) never be weaned? John saw Him on the island of Patmos and what does the Bible record? Revelation 1:17 reads, “And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not; I am the first and the last:” This is Jesus, the Jehovah of Israel!

They (Roman Catholic Popes) will be in Baal’s trouble if they should wean Jesus. Isis, the Egyptian goddess is always clutching on Horus, her baby of millennia. A diligent search will show you Semiramis breastfeeding Tammuz as well. Remember what I said earlier on? There is no difference between Semiramis and Isis for the twain are the one and the same goddess. Tammuz and Horus are not two different gods.

catholic & islam revere the moon & sun gods

Catholicism, Babylon and Islam cannot do without the moon (Semiramis)

Mary must also not be without baby Jesus. Why? Catholicism cannot afford to jettison Baal, their sun god. There should be little wonder why the Pope must insist on Mariolatry and the mediatrix role of Mary. Nimrod, Semiramis and Tammuz are they not long dead? Does Catholicism not stubbornly persist in the adoration of their dead saints? Are they worshipping Jesus the Christ, or Tammuz and Semiramis? The Bible strengthens our faith with, “For verily I say unto you, That whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith [Mark 11:23].” So why must Catholic faithfuls continue to purchase indulgences?

images_294

Without the moon Islamic worship will run into serious jeopardy. When in doubt as to whether one is facing the Kaaba or not, “Just face the rising sun,” is the Islamic safety advice. On their mosques are the artwork of the star and the crescent. Have Nimrod and his Semiramis received worship from Islam five times a day or not? Right there on each of the four huge minarets of Mecca mosque are the crescents! Below them are the subtle design of the sun. Why would Islam prefer the prominence of the crescent is not far-fetched. The pristine worshippers of Allah received or believed the moon as the god (Nimrod) and the sun as the goddess, you know who?

planets-asteroids-15293-1920x1080

The halo isn’t a representation God’s holiness. It’s of Nimrodic Satanism.

Get Jesus initiated by getting born again: pray this prayer, believing it with all your heart. Say, Dear heavenly Father, I come to You now in the name of Jesus Christ. I believe in my heart that Jesus is the Son of God. I believe that Jesus died on the cross for my sin. I believe that You raised Him from the dead. I confess with my mouth that Jesus is Lord and I receive Him now as my Lord and my Saviour. I give God all the glory. Amen!         (…to be continued…)

Read part one here.

Read part three here

The Mystery Of Wedlock (2nd part)

83806872a148f5cf422d5dbd2cbe3f39

         Satan, as the ape of Jehovah, waited for the reign of Nimrod to perpetrate the travesty of divinity. Nimrod established one universal religion, making him the true portrayal of the Antichrist. He, with his wife, Semiramis, and son, Tammuz formed the heinous trinity. Nimrod was the ruler of the world. He led them in a sacerdotal office and was worshipped as the sun god, Baal. Semiramis was appointed to the deified position which Eve, through her faithfulness to the covenant, rejected. His title of Baal means: ‘owner, lord and husband.’ The religious worship initiated the worshippers into an atrocious wedlock of esotericism. They became espoused to Nimrod spiritually. Lucifer understood the spiritual implication. Nimrod was Lucifer’s priest, hence, every obeisant gesture to Nimrod’s religious worship is in actuality an evil worship of the Devil himself. All married to Evil!

semiramis

Semiramis is Lucifer’s woman of his church

Many do not know what this conjugal phenomenon is all about. The design is for Christians only. The redeemed. It is God’s secret to bestow eternal salvation on man. God’s true love is revealed in His espousal of the redeemed. One must, as a matter of scriptural fact, be wedded to Jesus to receive the gift of heavenly citizenship. A good husband who has a gift for his wife learnt it from the Most High. Is there any proof that only born again Christians enters into this wedlock? The propitiatious blood of Jesus washes the born again justifiably sinless before the judging seat of the Creator. Adam entered into the primeval wedlock with the pristine woman, both of them quite sinless. The pristine couple were of the same Parent: the LORD God. Christians have one Holy Spirit, one Saviour and one Father. Any other marriage is a mere grotesque mimicry of God’s glorious institution.

aa02917f7a5d44a08af1be31c0f3b7e4

This mystical wedlock does not come to any termination. 2Corinthians 5:17 states that, “Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.” Old things are the natural sinful you. All things that ‘are become new’ speaks of your new spiritual existence. Verse twenty-one makes it crystal clear who owns the newness and whose righteousness you are wrapped in. You cannot lose your salvation as long as it has a connectivity with marriage for: of divorce Jesus catechized, “Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder” (Matthew 19:6).

When asked in the 7th verse why Moses taught to divorce, Jesus answered in the 8th, “He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.” God is a covenant keeper. Remember the scriptural caviar in Revelation 14:11 of whosoever receives the cultic name of the Antichrist is damned forever? So does the wedlock with Jesus! Should you still be in the dark concerning the divine security of the believer please search for my post titled, “Why Go Aminianistic Soteriology” and another one is “My Salvation (what can happen to it?)”

85617c03f5084780dcc692bd225dee32

God knows that if He leaves the maintenance of the redeemed life of Jesus us to, the impossibility stems from the fact that we lack the spiritual element of its sustenance. Jesus points out categorically in John 10:28 “And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.” What a good Jehovah God we serve! He beheld our natural weakness even as He was designing our future eternal blissfulness and decided to serve as the inn-keeping Caretaker. Hallelujah! “O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!” [Romans 11:33]. Selah. I rest my case.

eb03dff43240a5a9d30e1d9aad70fbf1

Get born again. Say this sinners’ prayer, meaning it from your heart: “Dear heavenly Father, I come to You now in the name of Jesus Christ. I believe in my heart that Jesus is the Son of God. I believe that Jesus died on the cross for my sin. I believe that You raised Him from the dead. I confess with my mouth that Jesus is Lord and I receive Him now as my Lord and my Saviour. I give God all the glory. Amen!               (Concluded)

Read the 1st part here

 

ALMIGHTY (ii)

dianaephesus2

                      The many breasted Diana: of fertility idolatry.

The goddess Diana in Ephesus is sculptured with many breasts in duplication of the Biblical El Shadday. This goddess dates back to Babel as Semiramis, the moon goddess and wife of Nimrod (the sun god). Idolatry has duplicated this goddess from one religion to another as Artemis (Roman), Ashtoreth (Hebrew), Astarte (Phoenician) and Isis (Egypt). A profanity of the truth. The business of Satanic doing. Unfortunately, the Roman Catholic Virgin Mary is unbelievably the same entity; the one Catholicism presents to the adherents as ‘queen of the saints, queen of the angels, mother of God (or god), queen of the world’. It is the same goddess Prophet Jeremiah calls the queen of heaven in: Jeremiah 7:18, 44:17, 44:18, 44:19 & 44:25. Let all who have ear pay good attention to the truth. Amen.

Luke 1:35, “And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God”. The power that comes readily to mind, of the Highest, is that of the Almighty. “But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you” [Romans 8:11]. The Holy Spirit wields this power too. The word ‘overshadow’ in Luke is episkiazō (ep-ee-skee-ad’-zo): ‘to cast a shade upon, that is, (by analogy) to envelop in a haze of brilliancy; figuratively to invest with preternatural influence’. Who else but God that can invest in anyone with the influence of preternaturalism? The Holy Ghost, Jesus Christ and the Father are the only three in the entire scriptures who are called Almighty.

The Almighty who appeared to Abraham in Genesis 17 is the same who says in Matthew 28:18, “All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth”. One’s spirit is not different from oneself. The Holy Spirit, being the Spirit Jesus (Galatians 4:6; Philippians 1:19) and of the Father (Matthew 10:20 1Corinthians 2:11) is hence the same Almighty God (Revelation 4:5; John 4:23-24).

jah2

The Almighty is in firm control of the universe: fret not!

One of the THREE is the visibleness of the representation of the unseen Jehovah. Have you ever asked yourself who did appear to Adam and his wife in the Eden Garden, since we have the scriptural understanding that God is invisible to our eyes? The LORD God of Genesis chapter 3 is the same Jehovah of Genesis 18 and of Revelation 21:22. The same One made an unbelievable declaration in the midst of Jews, in Matthew 12:8, “For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day”. This same Personage, the manifestation of the unseen God, was on the island of Patmos where He paid an unexpected visit to meet the one whom he loved when He traversed the land of Israel for three and a half years as an itinerant Preacher (Revelation 1) saying of Himself, “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty” [Revelation 1:8].

I have, here, Almighty or shadday as defined by two dictionaries here. (1) Easton Illustrated Bible Dictionary: Shaddai: the Omnipotent, the name of God in frequent use in the Hebrew Scriptures, generally translated “the Almighty.” (2) Fausset’s Bible Dictionary Shaddai: (“ALMIGHTY”) Gesenius derives from shad, shaadad, “to be strong.” [Isaiah 13:6] plays on similar sounds, “destruction from the Almighty,” shod (“devastating tempest”) from Shadday. Rashi and the Talmud (Chagiga, 12, section 1) from sh “He who is,” and day “all sufficient”.

And this is all I am trying to tell somebody who Jesus truly is! Amen!

If the solution of the problematic issue has to do with Jehovah God then fret not. Cool down. It is all well. HE can and will do all that is necessary to make it happen. Creationism came into being a la ex nihilo. Why, have you ever asked yourself, would He create the Sabbath as the last of days? It was to prove that He had already basked in the euphoria of eternal accomplishment! Who is the Lord of the Sabbath? Selah! (concluded)

Click to read the 1st part

WHICH JESUS? (part two)

 1a

YESHUA HA’ MASHIACH – JESUS IS THE MESSIAH

 

Continued from 1st part.

Say not “Trinity”: desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is one Allah: Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs”, concludes Qur’an 4:171. None but Allah is the saviour (Al-E-Imran i.e. 3:135); but Jesus is the only prophet called Messiah, eleven times, in Qur’an (3:45; 4:157, 171, 172; 5:17, 72, 75; 9:30 & 31). No doubt Mohammed did not know that Messiah, of Hebrew origin, is mashıyach (maw-shee’-akh), meaning: ‘one anointed to be king, priest, the Deliverer or Saviour!’ So, which Jesus is the Qur’an peddling? In 4:156-158 the Qur’an calls the Bible, which is the most perfectly documentation of God’s protocol, a lie. It did so by debunking the veracity contained in it concerning the crucifixion of Jesus. Which book is spreading lies the Bible or the Qur’an? In As-Saff, the 61st chapter the 6th verse quotes, “And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: “O Children of Israel! I am the messenger of Allah (sent) to you, confirming the Law (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad.” But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, “this is evident sorcery!” Could the Jesus of the Bible call Himself the messenger of Allah?

isis-semiramis-comparison         Would this same Jesus be telling Israelites that another prophet, Ahmad is coming from the same Allah! The 14th verse says His disciples were divided in faith and part of them decided to follow and to be witness of Allah. Ask yourself why Jehovah is alien to the Qur’an, and why Allah is not found in His corpus of revelation, the Bible, that is. God, in Exodus 3:14, gave His name as, “…I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you”. In verse 15 He made it known, “…this [is] my name for ever, and this [is] my memorial unto all generations”. “…but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them” of chapter 6:3, tells us what ‘I AM THAT I AM’ is. If verse 5 says it is God’s name for ever from generation to every generation, where cometh Allah, the one to whom Mohammed is his prophet?

 lord-krishna-latest-hd-widdescreen-mobile-imges-hd

                                      Does Krishna not sound like CHRIST?

  Show me any historical fact or documentation that makes Peter, Andrew, John, Bartholomew or any of the twelve or by extension the seventy who ever mentioned Allah of the Mohammedan Quraysh of Mecca. They even swear that it is in the Bible! One day, during our Saturday evangelism I opened John 14:16-26 to repudiate this untruthfulness a young boy had for years been fed with. Verse 26, “But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you”. Could or can Ahmad (aka Mohammad) teach all things. “Do you think this is your Mohammad?” The boy shook his head to give his negating answer.

the-new-age-christ

                                                     A ‘New Age’ Jesus of the occult

The Jesus of the Bible says categorically in John 14:6, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me”. Further down in verse 9 in response to Philip’s question, “Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?” It can never be the Jesus of the Mohammedan Qur’an who declared, “I and my Father are one” in John 10:30. The word ‘way’, hodus, also means ‘destiny’. How can a mere prophet be man’s destiny? ‘Truth’, alethia, speaks of ‘reality’ by which Jesus is revealed as the genuine One. ‘Zoe’ is the Greek word for ‘life’; God’s kind of life. How can a mere man possess God’s life, be the real Member of the Godhead and man’s destiny? This most definitely is not the Jesus that Mohammed’s prophecy calls Isa. No way!

ifa-worship

The Ifa oracle of divination

Ifa worshippers believe in the sonship of “Olódù” with Àrè”. They, by their spiritual, fruits, deny the power thereof. The Jesus of esotericism is known by designates of Grandmaster, Wise one, Avatar, the expected one etc. Listen to them as they teach where they gather. They offer sacrifices, a particular garment must be worn and the mode of worship taking a posture quite alien to Jesus Christ of the Bible. Some commence prayer sessions thus: “Jah! Jah! Jah! Jesus Christ! Holy Michael! O! Lord…!” Jah, I know and, of course, Jesus; but what scripture makes ‘Holy Michael’ an intercessor? This spiritual anomaly hangs an ominous question mark on the exclamatory ‘O! Lord!’ The spiritual smuggler of angel Michael’s veneration is the masquerading ‘Jesus’!

image19

If you wish to belong to the true Jesus of Jehovah. Pray this prayer to get born again. “Dear heavenly Father, I come to You now in the name of Jesus Christ. I believe in my heart that Jesus is the Son of God. I believe that Jesus died on the cross for my sin. I believe that You raised Him from the dead. I confess with my mouth that Jesus is Lord and I receive Him now as my Lord and my Saviour. I give God all the glory. Amen!(Concluded)

click here to read the 1st part

THE STAR AND THE CRESCENT (part two)

our_lady_mary_semiramis

Note the starry halo and the crescent beneath (Mary?). This is Semiramis or Queen Of Heaven of Catholicism.

Have you seen the halo depicting saintly purity around the heads of figures of the Catholicism veneration? Do you not know that it either symbolizes the sun or the wheel of a Babylonian god? It is pure idolatry. You cannot find it anywhere in depiction of a saint of the Almighty, biblically. Roman Catholic monstrance holding the Eucharist has a design of the crescent inside the sun to hold the type of wafer-god of Babylon within it, thereby depicting an exact duplicate of Babylonian worship of the sun-god BAAL. I do understand that these Vatican designs could just be a coincidental act from a love of aesthetic values. I am also absolutely not unaware of dozens of worship anomalies of Catholicism. The use of the crescent and the star is quite an ancient practice. They appear on coins and used in magical practices especially the masonic Star of David (which cannot be traced to Davidic or biblical historical verification).

roman-catholic-sun-symbols

                                                         Pictures do not lie or do they?

It is for this Catholic practice I find it expedient to make an allusion to St. Bernard story. Mary, it is believed, exposed her breast to Saint Bernard, (while nursing baby Jesus -who’s refused to be weaned?) and shot her breast milk into his eye. Presently, people say that while receiving milk from the ‘heavenly Mother’, Saint Bernard was initiated into supreme consciousness and adopted as the son of God and Mary. The more medieval wording was that Mary filled him with all divine graces and purified all his sins. Hence her title “Our Lady of All Graces”. How Christian is this? Let someone tell me.

satanic-pope-hexagram    The hexagram is Kabalistic.

Archaeological excavations and historical corroborations have proved that Mohammedan Allah has an ancient attachment to moon worship. Arabians, unlike the Nimrod’s Babel belief that the sun is the god, did worship moon as the god and the sun as his wife (I believe I know why the moon is an Islamic deciding factor!). The image of the star and the crescent came to my mind and in a flash, while in a Church service, and I saw it. The star is the sun (Nimrod, all over again) and the crescent is none other than the moon goddess Semiramis! Allah, etymologically, is of two: al (the) and illahu (generic word for god) words. Allah, the god, is, therefore, quite different from the Christian God, Jehovah. No wonder the Qur’an will neither make any mention of the covenant name, I AM THAT I AM nor Jerusalem (His venerated city of worship) and why the Bible will perforce exclude Allah. Okay, maybe it is another religious attempt appreciative of the Creator’s design of the heavenly bodies. Why venerate a Black stone which should be kissed any time of a hajj pilgrimage? The Old Testament, the part which Islam believes says, “Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am the LORD your God” [Leviticus 26:1]. So, please do tell me. Why do you have to march round the Kaaba, an ancient coven for 360 gods, including Allah and his three reputed goddesses? This is what Numbers 33:52 says, “Then ye shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down all their high places”. But we know the black stone, an idolatrous relic of his Quraysh tribesmen is a centre of Kaaba worship.

images_111

Mohammed got a prophecy from Allah concerning where to face when offering the five daily prayers. “Face the Ka’aba”, he instructed. “Kaaba is where the sun rises”, Moslems were educated. If you are in North America, North Africa or West Africa and you face the sun rising east you can be facing the Kaaba. Central and South African countries, Oman and U.A.E., as close as they are to Saudi Arabia will miss the Kaaba if they should face the east. If they should face the direction of the Kaaba, they will certainly be facing the west, the opposite of Qur’anic injunction. Does God, the Creator not have a good knowledge of geography? Russia, India, and all the countries to the East, including Australia and whole lots of Europe will be in trouble! The truth here is that Allah wants all Moslems to face his emblematic heavenly body, the sun. Sun worship. Period! Take a good look at the Mecca Mosque. Atop each minaret is a crescent. Call it a coincidence, but I can also see circular sun-like designs on the minaret!

solar-disc

Why must Roman Catholic use this in church service? It is a Catholic star & crescent adoption.

Exodus 23:32, “Thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor with their gods”. Deuteronomy 7:5, “But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire”. Exodus 23:24, “Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works: but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images”.

mecca-mosque

  If you doubt Islamic inclusion, this is its holiest shrine, the Mecca Mosque.

It is quite easy to have an idea passed down to another generation. Satan, who must continue to have man deceived, teaches his idolatrous ways to every generation. He has been there before the creation of man. And it is for this good grounds of Nimrod’s creation of idolatrous cosmos that we should tread cautiously in our bid to reach out to the LORD God, the Almighty. Nature should not be your consultant in the true worship of the Lord God. Amen! (Concluded)

Click here to read the 1st part.

THE STAR AND THE CRESCENT (part one)

images_294

Have you ever wondered what significant role the star and the crescent play in phenomenal symbolism? Cain probably used it. I want to believe he did use it. Nimrod, most definitely made it a cosmic symbol of esotericism.

The Bible teaches that Cain, in Genesis 4:16, left the presence of the LORD God, took a dwelling place in the east of Eden. Why go to the east? Does the Bible not say, in 1Timothy 6:16, of God to be “dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto…” If Satan has to disciple man, it is imperative for him to share a certain enlightenment. Knowledge is of light but Cain had just lost the Light, having left the presence of God. The east produces the rising sun. Lucifer pushed him away from the Creator so that Cain will have to worship the creature. The word ‘east’ in Genesis 4:16 is qidmah (kid-maw’), meaning: ‘forward, front, east, antiquity’. Qidmah is a feminine noun. In the documentation of primordial idolatrous Arabic mythology, the moon is a god ilah. Satan could not get the original woman to congregate in his assemblage – the church! He made use of the available Cain – a male! Satan also established the deceitful symbolism of the sun. God already has the woman and He is the first to go to the east in Genesis 2:8; and this east albeit is of the same definition, it happens to be a masculine noun word of qedem (keh’-dem).

Qidmah is the Hebrew for the ‘east’ in Genesis 2:14. The significance of its feminine gender as a river is seen in the fact that it carries God’s message -the gospel to other place- by the Church. Water is emblematic of human beings and also the Word of God. In Genesis 3:14 it is qedem, where the angel of the Lord is barring all falsehood forms of religious activities. God had established His Church in the pristine family.

sun-crescent

Why is the star and the crescent so religiously prominent? Every star, elementary science will teach you, is another sun! The crescent is actually the fullness of the moon as the days roll by.

The esoteric portrayal of the sun dates back to Nimrodic days of Genesis 10:8-9; v.8 “And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth. V.9 He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD”. The prepositional ‘before’, panıym (paw-neem’): ‘the face (as the part that turns); used in a great variety of applications (figuratively) speaks of impudence’. Nimrod, historically is bel or baal, meaning lord of Babel. In his kingdom he was worshipped as the sun god. His wife Semiramis was the moon goddess. Ra is the Egyptian sun god, the same as the original baal of Nimrod. Egypt happens to be the next world power after Nimrod’s rule of the entire earth a la the eschatological coming antichrist. Cain built the first city. Nimrod built the second city, historically. Idolatrous Egypt, as the world super power, was next in line of propagation of sun and moon worship. Check out the cities of the world historically and behold the extent of Satanic worship.

moon-sun-symbols

Vatican                                          Babylonian                                  Islam                    

The Satanic star & crescent has found its way into Catholicism, esoteric societies and Islam.

Baal worship spread globally. Sunday was set aside for sun or Baal worship. Where does Monday come from? Semiramis, Nimrod’s wife, of course, and no doubt the reason why one comes after the other in the days of the week! Thursday pays obeisance to Thor, god of thunder, replicated in all the continents of the globe. Saturn, known to be a hidden name of Satan, is the seventh day of Saturday. Jehovah commanded to be worshipped on Sabbath, the 7th and the last day of the week. This is how Satanic subtlety has been employed in the religious activity of mankind. Satan has never been in want of an earthly agent. He derailed our pristine parents spiritually. In the light of, “Father, forgive them for they know not…,” I can say that Cain was conscripted, with all unequivocalness. What the Devil did with Nimrod he introduced to the Pharaoh and all consequent leaders of the world.

images_214

Satan even owns the money! 

Satan had to resort to the employment of what I call Religious Alternatives to cover up the deviousness of being worshipped. Seeing that Adam’s Eve would not follow him to establish his religion he had no choice but to take Cain, a male, as opposed to a woman (the genesis of homosexuality). Christ is the True Light (Genesis 1:3; John 1:4-9). Lucifer needed to prove to have illumination so he claimed the sun (ever heard of Illuminati?). Lucifer died spiritually, losing the lively Word of God. He cannot use the Word, so, symbolism (i.e. heavenly bodies, animals, incantations and signals) characterizes his activities. An alternative god is idolatrous.

minaret

 What is the crescent doing on the mosque?

The minaret, from where the muezzin calls for each of the five daily prayers, has the design (it will be quite plausible to argue) of the star and the crescent of Baal worship. An Egyptian temple parades Isis, Horus and Ra with an inevitable sun disc and the crescent. Where do the countries of the world get the star and crescent design on their flags and coat of arms? The purported ‘star of David’ is actually a Kabbalistic symbolism. The good King David of Israel never, for once, delved into any esoteric fraternity. According to Collins Dictionary, kabbala is an ancient Jewish mystical tradition based on an esoteric interpretation of the Old Testament. It comes from Hebrew qabbālāh: ‘tradition, what is received’, from qābal: ‘to receive’. Kabbala, most glaringly, was never received from Jehovah. (…to be continued…)

Click here to read the 2nd part.