CATHOLICISM AND MARY (XII)

Apotheosis of Mary (wonder why she’s standing on moon?)

(…continued from part XI…)

(XII)       How many Catholic faithfuls pray through Mary each day? Are they not up to a billion? She is not omniscient to know all, like Jesus. Is she omnipotent with the capability endowment to do all? To attend to all prayers, she must be omnipresent. Catholics scattered all over the terra firma praying to Mary definitely do it in vain. Hebrews 12:2 says, “Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.” Jesus it is; not Mary. Amen.                                                                                                            

                How I wish with all fervour that Catholicism would be jettisoned by the Romish Church, go back to the Church of Jesus which received The Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the Romans. This was an erudition of Pauline scriptural didacticism at his best. Paul did not make mention of Peter in this book, penned circa 58 A.D. neither did he make any mention of an apotheosis of Mary. Trust Paul to have admonished the Christians of Rome if Nimro-Semiramis was a religious practice. Paul taught the salvation found only in Jesus. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation(Romans 10:10). This is what the Bible says of Apollos in Acts 18:28, “For he mightily convinced the Jews, and that publickly, shewing by the scriptures that Jesus was Christ;” having understood the word of God through Priscilla and Aquila, who were tutored by Paul.                                                               

Is this Semiramis or Mary?

                It is most definitely Jesus, and none else as we read of divine divulgement in Matthew 16:16, “And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.” The same Peter made the utterance of John 6:68-69, 68) “Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. 69) And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God.” Mary, to whom apotheosis does not belong could never be quoted as voicing the verses of John 11:25-27. 25) “Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: 26) And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this? 27) She saith unto him, Yea, Lord: I believe that thou art the Christ, the Son of God, which should come into the world.” The word ‘believe’ and all the inflections ‘believeth and believest’ is the same Greek pisteuo (pist-yoo’-o) ‘1. to have faith (in, upon, or with respect to, a person or thing), i.e. credit 2. (by implication) to entrust (especially one’s spiritual well-being to Christ).’ Spiritual pisteuo is to be entrusted only to the Divinity of Jesus, otherwise, there is so much to lose. Reliance on Mary and myriads of dead saints of Catholicism in intercessory prayers is nothing short of filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness which Apostle James expects to be laid aside. Amen.

                Ascension of Mary, where in the Old or the New Testament does it boast of a biblical record? It is merely of unscriptural Catholicism. Did Joseph, her husband, go through the same physical ascension as well? I guess not! Selah!

Ascension of Mary, of Scripture?

                We understand what Exodus 20:4-5 commands concerning images. Acts 17:29 says, “Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device.” The term ‘Godhead’ is the Greek theios (thi’-os): ‘1. a general name of deities or divinities as used by the Greeks spoken of the only and true God. 2. Trinity of: Christ, Holy Spirit and the Father. 3. Godlike (neuter as noun, divinity).’ If the Godhead cannot be materially represented for adoration how could Catholics set Mary up for bending of the knees? Mary, whose pious enunciation placed the salvation of her soul in the Lord God asserted in Luke 1:47, And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.

What’s this!?

                Creationism embroidered in every intelligent being, a heart of adoratory predisposition. Docility, engendered by the original sin, man would prostrate in worship of what ignites his religious fancy. Catholicism, laden with speciosity of Scripture, has successfully wrapped her adherents in the straitjacket of religion. Honestly, no sophistry is required to inculcate John 3:3. A hardened criminal tore the Bible leaves to clean the defecation of the lower orifice of his alimentary canal. After some days, he decided to read ‘the stupid page’ before its desecration. He began to weep uncontrollably when his sinful proclivity hit him as he read, “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” [John 3:16]. The criminal, right there on the toilet pot, calling on Jesus, got born again! Not properly processed is the scripture that runs through the conduit of sophism: and honestly speaking, adorcism is very likely the resultant effect! Selah!

                You want to know what establishes the enforcement of Mariolatry? This is it. In the eighth century, the second council of Nicea decreed that the image of God was as proper an object of worship as God Himself. If you truly love God, will you obey or disobey His express mand? Selah!

Pope Francis touches a statue of Mary and Jesus after crowning it during Mass at Lobito beach in Iquique, Chile, Jan. 18. (CNS photo/Paul Haring) See POPE-LOBITO-MASS Jan. 18, 2018.

LIKE POPE FRANCIS, LIKE EVERY OTHER POPE BEFORE HIM –WOULD APOSTLE PETER DO LIKEWISE?

  (Concluded)

NB= I’d very much love to read your candid contributions. Thank you!

Read the previous 11th part here

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (IV)

Pope Francis touches a statue of Mary and Jesus after crowning it during Mass at Lobito beach in Iquique, Chile, Jan. 18. (CNS photo/Paul Haring) See POPE-LOBITO-MASS Jan. 18, 2018.

Pope Frances supports the adoration of Mary & the Jesus they refuse to get weaned

(…continued from part three…)

IV.          “But ye are they that forsake the LORD, that forget my holy mountain, that prepare a table for that troop, and that furnish the drink offering unto that number” [Isaiah 65:11].

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown’s Commentary on Isaiah 65:11

holy mountain*Moriah, on which the temple was.

troop*—rather “Gad,” the Babylonian god of fortune, the planet Jupiter, answering to Baal or Bel; the Arabs called it “the Greater Good Fortune”; and the planet Venus answering to Meni, “the Lesser Good Fortune” [GESENIUS, KIMCHI, c.]. Tables were laid out for their idols with all kinds of viands, and a cup containing a mixture of wine and honey, in Egypt especially, on the last day of the year [JEROME].

*drink offeringrather, “mixed drink.”

*number*—rather, “Meni” as goddess of fortune she was thought to _number_ the fates of men. VITRINGA understands Gad to be the sun; Meni the moon, or Ashtaroth or Astarte (1Ki 11:33).

                “But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves” [Amo 5:26].

John Gill’s Commentary on Amos 5:26

‘But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch,…. The god of the Ammonites;  called theirs, because they also worshipped it, and caused their seed to pass through the fire to it; and which was carried by them in a shrine, or portable tent or chapel. Or it may be rendered, “but ye have borne Siccuth your king” p; and so Siccuth may be taken for the name of an idol, as it is by Jarchi, Kimchi, and Ben Melech, to whom they gave the title of king, as another idol went by the name of the queen of heaven; perhaps by one was meant the sun, and by the other the moon;

and Chiun, your images; Moloch or Siccuth was one, and Chiun another image, or rather the same; and this the same with Chevan, which in the Arabic and Persic languages is the name of Saturn, as Aben Ezra and Kimchi say; and is so rendered by Montanus here; and who in the Egyptian tongue was called Revan, or Rephan, or Remphan; as by the Septuagint here, and in Ac 7:43;

the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves; or the star “your god” q; meaning the same with Chiun or Saturn; perhaps the same with the star that fell from the air or sky, mentioned by Sanchoniatho r; which Astarte, the wife of Chronus or Saturn, is said to take and consecrate in Tyre; this they made for themselves, and worshipped as a deity. The Targum is, “ye have borne the tabernacle of your priests, Chiun your image, the star your God, which ye have made to yourselves.”                                                    

                Marian epithets of Catholicism were never handed down to Catholic fathers. These epithetic Mariolatry are the scriptural paradoxicalities of Romish rumination. They are not Pauline, Peterine or Johannine. They have no backing of the twelve-pillared Apostolic offices of the upper-room event (ten days after Christ’s ascension) of nascent Church. They crept in from outside the Church of the Living Jesus. It probably began with St. Irenaeus of Lyons, in the second century A.D. He called Mary the “second Eve” because through Mary and her willing acceptance of God’s choice, God undid the harm that was done through Eve’s choice to eat the forbidden fruit. The earliest recorded prayer to Mary is the sub tuum praesidium (“Beneath Thy Protection”), a hymn of Catholicism. It is the oldest preserved extant hymn to the Blessed Virgin Mary as Theotokos.                                                                                                                                       In the First Council of Nicaea which took place in the year 325 AD they agreed on the virgin birth of Jesus. The outcome of the First Council made it quite easy for the Mary of Catholicism to become the mother of God in the First Council of Ephesus of 431. Saint Ambrose’s view of Mary as the Mother of the Church, was adopted at the Second Vatican Council. This is an example that shows the early influence of Roman Catholic (and never of the twelve called Apostles of Jesus) traditions and views on Mary in modern times. This view was then emphasized by Pope John Paul II in 1997. Mary, today, is viewed as the Mother of the Church by many Catholics, as Ambrose had proposed.                                                                                                                                          

Is this not Pope John Paul II? Is this a latria bow or not? Is it to Jesus or Mary?

                The Fourth Ecumenical Council saw Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Lutheran and Anglican affirming the title Mother of God, while other Christian denominations give no such title to her. The ‘Middle Ages,’ as documented, saw a growth and development of Mariology.  Conception of Mary was celebrated as a liturgical feast in England from the 9th century, and the doctrine of her “holy” or “immaculate” conception was first formulated in a tract by Eadmer, companion and biographer of the better-known St. Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury (1033–1109). St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Bonaventure, for example, believed that Mary was completely free from sin, but that she was not given this grace at the instant of her conception.  

(…to be continued…)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

NB= I’d very much love to read your candid contributions. Thank you!

Read part three here

Read the 5th part here

An Ambassador (For Christ or Lucifer) -2nd part

 

303079_190518517683505_100001760755869_431473_5275887_n 

(Continued from the 1st part)   The truth is that when you use falsity to teach Jesus Christ you will definitely expose yourself with your very stance. Mariolatry points so effortlessly to Prophet Jeremiah’s condemnation of ‘the queen of heaven’ in Jeremiah 7:18; 44:17-19; 44:25 and Pauline allusion to the terrible jealousy of God we ignite by this sinful act in 1Corinthians 10:22, “Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he?” This incorrigible opiumism of Catholicism to Mariology leaves us no room but to understand who her ambassadorial missiology rightly serves. It may be of interest to note that this ‘queen of heaven’ is a religious reference to the moon. The demonic entity behind it is Ashtoreth or Astarte, the wife of Baal (sun god). Understand also that the first man to lead the earthly propagation of idolatry after the great deluge was Nimrod, who was worshipped as bel or baal and as the sun god. His wife, Semiramis was the one the Phoelignician worshippers called the moon i.e. Ashtoreth or Astarte: the wife of Baal or Moloch, the king of heaven. To them the male and female pair of deities symbolized the generative (most probably where Illuminati get their ‘G’ symbol) powers of nature; hence arose the introduction of prostitution in the worship.

The Babylonians worshipped Ashtoreth as Mylitta, that is, generative. Our Monday, or Moon-day, indicates the former prevalence of moon worship and the Bible says in Isaiah 65:11, “But ye are they that forsake the LORD, that forget my holy mountain, that prepare a table for that troop, and that furnish the drink offering unto that number”. Talk about concupiscence, maybe it is the spirit of Astarte that accounts for priests’ randiness. The invocation of Mary as the mediatrix certainly exhumes and imports an unscriptural Semiramis into Christianity. It is as simple as that. Was it the Holy Spirit that told the Pope to carry out an expunction of the second commandment in an expurgatory exercise? Definitely the 2nd law of, “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: v. 5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me” [Exodus 20:4-5]; is offensive to Romish indoctrinating penchant love for the adoration of artwork. Apostolic Succession is another scriptural anomaly from Catholicism. If they teach that every Pope is a successor of Peter, who succeeded Paul, Matthew, James, Bartholomew, John, Thaddeus, Philip and the other apostles, or are they not apostles of the Lord Jesus?

170px-canonization_2014-_the_canonization_of_saint_john_xxii  Pope Francis

 

The Pope, as the head of the Roman Catholic Church, is often called the “Holy Father” and the “Vicar of Christ”. These titles and roles only find an application to God. As “Holy Father”, he is God the Father or Christ (as found in Isaiah 9:6). “Vicar of Christ” makes the pope Christ (as coming from the Father) or the Holy Spirit (the Comforter). This guy is calling himself God, the Creator, just as others before him! He claims the ability to speak ex cathedra, which implies that the pope exercises a Godlike infallibility which enables him to add to and augment Scripture. What! I am flabbergasted, overwhelmed and completely nonplussed at the reckless impunity with which Catholicism treats the Word of God, well maybe no pope ever read Revelation 22:18-20, where we have in the 18th verse, “For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book”.

The word ‘testify’ contextually is different from the ‘testifieth’ of the 20th verse. Testify is summartureō (soom-mar-too-reh’-o): ‘to testify jointly, that is, corroborate by (concurrent) evidence’. This summartureō is applied to John as an ambassador for Christ. ‘Testifieth’ of the 20th verse is martureō (mar-too-reh’-o): ‘to be a witness, that is, testify (literally or figuratively)’. Martureō in this context is in connection with the true or original Testifier Himself, the Word of God, even the Lord Jesus. The Roman Catholic Pope wields unbiblical and unholy authority over his followers, usurping the headship of Christ and perverting the work of the Holy Spirit.

charles-russell

Charles Taze Russell of Jehovah’s Witness

All that Jehovah’s Witness sect saw in the Bible is the Book of 1Thessalonians 4:16, “For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first”; to make an angelic conclusion of Christ. The title, ‘Lord’ in Greek is kurios (koo’-ree-os): ‘From κυρος kuros (supremacy); supreme in authority, that is, (as noun) controller’. This is a Greek title very similar to the Hebrew ‘Jehovah’. “For the Lord himself shall descend…” is an emphatic statement of God intimation. The word ‘shout’ is keleuma (kel’-yoo-mah): ‘a cry of incitement, an order, command, spec. a stimulating cry, either that by which animals are roused and urged on by man, as horses by charioteers, hounds by hunters etc.’. The Lord Jesus gives an order and the archangel (possibly, Michael) responds with a ‘voice’ which is phōnē (fo-nay’): ‘through the idea of disclosure; ‘a tone (articulate, bestial or artificial); by implication an address (for any purpose), saying or language’. The archangel echoes the Lord’s command. Two people (The Lord and His creature) verbalize the same thing. Charles Taze Russell either did not understand or just wanted to teach the wrong doctrine. Russell taught that the Holy Spirit was just an inanimate intangibility and that the doctrine of the Trinity is of the occult. (…to be continued…)

Read 1st part by clicking here

THE SANCTUARY INCURSION (part four)

johnhuss

                               Jan Hus at stake, sentenced to death by the Catholicism of Vatican.

The sale of Indulgences, commonly regarded as a purchase of forgiveness and a permit to indulge in sin (pay now sin later programme) became a historic tradition in 1190. Christianity, as taught in the Bible, condemns such a traffic and it was the protest against this traffic that brought on the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century. Jan Hus, born in Husinec, Bohemia (now Czech Republic) in 1370, was burnt in July 6, 1415, for criticizing Catholicism.

our_lady_mary_semiramis

Semiramis, Isis and Catholic Mary look, & are the  same

Exodus 20:4-5 read, (4) “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: 5) Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me”. Catholicism is clearly satanically motivated to continue in image worship. They could even swear not being culpable of the Second Commandment infringement. Rather than stopping the wrong thing, the Pope went ahead to expunge the 2nd Commandment to enable Catholics’ the joy of image worship. They still maintain the Ten by deceitfully dividing the 9th in two. Devil worship of Catholicism is an egregious display of spiritual irresponsibility. “We are not worshipping images, we’re only praying to God through them”, one woman told me, trying to explain it away. Who is fooling who?

The Romish Church opened the door too wide for evil incursion. Is the Vatican Church of Jesus? I doubt it! Last year, around the middle of 2015, Pope Francis spoke ex cathedra (i.e. infallibly as Jesus Christ would), telling the world that God had placed on his papal shoulders of the need to modify the Ten Commandments. The 7th will be removed (to enable God to shower love unto the inhuman carnal act of homosexualism). Two others will be added to make Eleven Commandments (which will cater for the exigencies of a modern 21st century). I thought it is crystal clear that God’s laws are eternally current! Definitely not Pope Francis, a Jesuit priest, after the order of Ignatius Loyola!

 

 

babylonian-trinity

The entire earth is filled with religious ideas that originally started with the Babylonian leaders Nimrod, Tammuz and Semiramis.

 

 

It is clear that the woman of Eden, created perfectly, was not a weakling. One of the Hebraic meaning of ‘woman’, ishshah, is a circle – that surrounds her husband- making her his bodyguard. Why did she fall? She comes from a source, hence dependent. She is under instruction. Rather than exploit the power of her source and depend wholly on the instruction of her priestly Adam, she made a room in her heart to give an audience to the enemy. In the course of Satan’s discourse with her, the Devil initiated an unguarded utterance of, “neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die (Genesis 3:3).” And that was a deviation from the oracular protocol of Genesis 2:17, “But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” She began to long for an ungodly need and all the enemy had to do was simply to appeal to her needy stance.

The good LORD is never a melodramatist else I should hear Him stutter to show the graveness of His response of Genesis 3:11. He strolled in in His Majestic strides as the Lord of creation and as cool as cucumber and in consonance with the coolness of the day He asked calmly, “Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?” It was a catastrophic strike at the first Church. God’s earthly abode of the Garden of Eden ceased to function as the rendezvous of His worship for it was bereft of worshippers of the sanctuary. This is the saddest story of mankind.

“And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat (Genesis 3:6)”. The sanctuary incursion is caused by satanic projection. “When the woman saw”, is not the same thing as ‘what God made the woman to see’. The church leaders are made to see, by the enemy, what does not pertain to God’s visual projection. They warm up to it and the digestion of the devilish product is actually an initiation into Satanism. Is it not of what you consume into your system that you receive your growth? They agreed within their inner being that people will see this and come to church. It is what they see that is birthed: syncretic establishment, esoterically empowered miracles and unbiblical indoctrination. The fructification of the evil fruit is the attendant wisdom which was introduced. Satan’s wisdom is the craftiness of witchcraft which crept into the Church of God! (Concluded)

Click here to read part three.