Does the word of God agree with the 25th of December birthday of Jesus? The answer is an emphatic, “No!” Was this practice idolatrous, originally? Yes, of course. Would it not be right to apprise Christians of the involvement of heathen implication of December 25th Christmas celebration? Honestly speaking, I do not see the reason why the Church should abrogate the memorialization of the Nativity on every 25th of December, regardless of Nimrodic sun worship of Baal devotedness.


Nimrodic sun adoration began with Cain, who had to go eastward to build the city of Enoch, ostensibly given the baleful direction by Satan, the Devil. None can venture the name of Cain’s wife probably because Satan was trying to ape God by having his dark church in cultic concealment. Enter Nimrod, and Luciferian worship went full blast globally. As the original Baal and sun, idolatrous god, Nimrod’s deity was reportedly commemorated every 25th December.


Sundry tales wound reportedly around this 25th. One of them being that, Semiramis, the mother and wife of Nimrod, instituted the 25th to monumentalize her king, husband and lord as the sun god. They had a son, Tammuz, with whom the idolatrous trinity of Babylonian religion was completed. Babel, the centre of sun god worship is, from Hebrew Bābhél, which from Akkadian, is Bāb-ilu, literally: ‘gate of God.’ Which god, for it is certainly not of Jehovah? It is incontrovertibly of Baal, the Nimrodic sun deity of Satanism. Baal worship was engendered by a self-deification pampered by an inebriation of humanism.


Egyptian trinity of Osiris, Horus and Isis.


After the disruption of Babel’s elusive dream by Jehovah, the vagrant Lucifer shifted the heinous enterprise to the next global super-power. To Egypt, the cradle of modern civilisation, a replica of Nimrodic trinity, he went to set it up. Osiris, in Egypt, is the chief, sun god. His worshipped wife is Isis, the moon goddess and to perfect the trinity is Horus, their deified son. These were passed on to Nebuchadnezzar’s Babylon in different designates. Greece conquered the world with the backing of Greek versions of these same gods. Even Rome was not left out in the global sun worship. Catholicism of the Pope picked the pieces of the relics of Nimrod and incorporated into the Roman Catholic Church.


     Semiramis & Tammuz                Isis & Horus                    Mary of Catholicism


Isis Semiramis comparison

Catholicism had continued to prove stiff necked in her adoration of Mary as ‘Mother of God?’ Let me uncloak this doctrine. Semiramis was both wife and mother of Nimrod. She was also deified as ‘the mother of god.’ The mother and child depiction is a syndromic phenomenon of spiritual capitulation. Semiramis is presented giving suck to baby Tamuuz in Baal worship. Baby Horus is also portrayed clutching his Isis mother. This is the Catholic spiritual connectivity. How do I know? The Bible, God’s protocol does not in anywhere establish spiritual mother/son adoration. There is no motherhood in the heavenly assizes! Deceivers are bound to goof! Thank God for that. Smart ones will see through them and keep away from them. Amen!


Roman Emperor Constantine

It was in the year 336 AD that the Roman Emperor Constantine pronounced December 25th as the birth date of Jesus. Years later in 350 AD Pope Julius I declared December 25 the official date that Christ was born, and from then it was celebrated by Christians worldwide. That Catholic Pope did not receive the instruction from the Holy Spirit and neither was it from Jesus. Maybe he did it to invite the heathenish world into Christianity, but, must it be in the fashion of heathenism? From all the indications of Catholicism, Pope Julius I knew exactly what he was doing. He was putting finishing touches to the religious syncretistic desideration of the Roman Catholic Church. Jesus arrived into our world when none expected.


The nativity: True Incarnation

God, no doubt, made sure none kept the record of the exact date. It was His Divine incarnation. If He has no beginning and no ending why should the parturition of His humanity receive a public knowledge? It would not surprise me if Jesus was born on a Sunday. Creationism commenced on day one. It ended on day six. On the seventh day, the Sabbath, He rested. And that day was the first Saturday of the creation of our world. Man was created on a Friday: day six.                           (…to be continued…)

click here to read part two


Horus, Egyptian version of Jesus.

WHICH JESUS? (part two)




Continued from 1st part.

Say not “Trinity”: desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is one Allah: Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs”, concludes Qur’an 4:171. None but Allah is the saviour (Al-E-Imran i.e. 3:135); but Jesus is the only prophet called Messiah, eleven times, in Qur’an (3:45; 4:157, 171, 172; 5:17, 72, 75; 9:30 & 31). No doubt Mohammed did not know that Messiah, of Hebrew origin, is mashıyach (maw-shee’-akh), meaning: ‘one anointed to be king, priest, the Deliverer or Saviour!’ So, which Jesus is the Qur’an peddling? In 4:156-158 the Qur’an calls the Bible, which is the most perfectly documentation of God’s protocol, a lie. It did so by debunking the veracity contained in it concerning the crucifixion of Jesus. Which book is spreading lies the Bible or the Qur’an? In As-Saff, the 61st chapter the 6th verse quotes, “And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: “O Children of Israel! I am the messenger of Allah (sent) to you, confirming the Law (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad.” But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, “this is evident sorcery!” Could the Jesus of the Bible call Himself the messenger of Allah?

isis-semiramis-comparison         Would this same Jesus be telling Israelites that another prophet, Ahmad is coming from the same Allah! The 14th verse says His disciples were divided in faith and part of them decided to follow and to be witness of Allah. Ask yourself why Jehovah is alien to the Qur’an, and why Allah is not found in His corpus of revelation, the Bible, that is. God, in Exodus 3:14, gave His name as, “…I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you”. In verse 15 He made it known, “…this [is] my name for ever, and this [is] my memorial unto all generations”. “…but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them” of chapter 6:3, tells us what ‘I AM THAT I AM’ is. If verse 5 says it is God’s name for ever from generation to every generation, where cometh Allah, the one to whom Mohammed is his prophet?


                                      Does Krishna not sound like CHRIST?

  Show me any historical fact or documentation that makes Peter, Andrew, John, Bartholomew or any of the twelve or by extension the seventy who ever mentioned Allah of the Mohammedan Quraysh of Mecca. They even swear that it is in the Bible! One day, during our Saturday evangelism I opened John 14:16-26 to repudiate this untruthfulness a young boy had for years been fed with. Verse 26, “But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you”. Could or can Ahmad (aka Mohammad) teach all things. “Do you think this is your Mohammad?” The boy shook his head to give his negating answer.


                                                     A ‘New Age’ Jesus of the occult

The Jesus of the Bible says categorically in John 14:6, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me”. Further down in verse 9 in response to Philip’s question, “Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?” It can never be the Jesus of the Mohammedan Qur’an who declared, “I and my Father are one” in John 10:30. The word ‘way’, hodus, also means ‘destiny’. How can a mere prophet be man’s destiny? ‘Truth’, alethia, speaks of ‘reality’ by which Jesus is revealed as the genuine One. ‘Zoe’ is the Greek word for ‘life’; God’s kind of life. How can a mere man possess God’s life, be the real Member of the Godhead and man’s destiny? This most definitely is not the Jesus that Mohammed’s prophecy calls Isa. No way!


The Ifa oracle of divination

Ifa worshippers believe in the sonship of “Olódù” with Àrè”. They, by their spiritual, fruits, deny the power thereof. The Jesus of esotericism is known by designates of Grandmaster, Wise one, Avatar, the expected one etc. Listen to them as they teach where they gather. They offer sacrifices, a particular garment must be worn and the mode of worship taking a posture quite alien to Jesus Christ of the Bible. Some commence prayer sessions thus: “Jah! Jah! Jah! Jesus Christ! Holy Michael! O! Lord…!” Jah, I know and, of course, Jesus; but what scripture makes ‘Holy Michael’ an intercessor? This spiritual anomaly hangs an ominous question mark on the exclamatory ‘O! Lord!’ The spiritual smuggler of angel Michael’s veneration is the masquerading ‘Jesus’!


If you wish to belong to the true Jesus of Jehovah. Pray this prayer to get born again. “Dear heavenly Father, I come to You now in the name of Jesus Christ. I believe in my heart that Jesus is the Son of God. I believe that Jesus died on the cross for my sin. I believe that You raised Him from the dead. I confess with my mouth that Jesus is Lord and I receive Him now as my Lord and my Saviour. I give God all the glory. Amen!(Concluded)

click here to read the 1st part

WHICH JESUS? (part one)


The LORD God, the Lamb, our High Priest and the Lion of Judah.

There is hardly any religious sect that does not have a replica of the Lord Jesus. Is the reason far-fetched? I think not. Without this most enigmatic Personage there, most definitely, would not have been the act of creationism.

He is the perfection of truth – the Light. He is the salvaging Spirit, called the Word of God. Every religion must, as a matter of necessity, find a place for this Personage.



Docetic championing by Cerinthus did believe in Christ but not as the scripture teaches, thereby parading another Jesus. Docetism stems from Gnostic ideology of human mental escapade. You may be smart enough to punch a hole in my submission, especially when the emergence of Jesus (the Incarnation) on earth comes millennia after much older religions is taken into cognizance. Jesus is the eternal Christ.

Hinduism has, as one of its deities, Krishna. He is said to have reincarnated severally and that the last time he did so he came or left at age twelve (12 is the spiritual number of Jesus). Cain went to the east (where the light – i.e. Jesus- of the day rises). Nimrod (sun god) formed an unholy trinity with his wife (Semiramis – moon goddess) and son, Tammuz. Buddha was purportedly brought into conception by a virgin mother, a queen, through the manipulations of the demonic spirits.


                                          Krishna’s foster mother

The Jehovah’s Witness bible reads in John 1:1, “In the beginning was the word, the word was with God and the word was a god”. The God’s ‘Word’ of Charles Taze Russell is a god with a small ‘g’ i.e. a demon. To them Jesus the Christ is an angel: an angel of creationism. Jesus, we acknowledge, is worshipped in the Book of Revelation (Psalm 72:11; Isaiah 45:23; Romans 14:10; Philippians 2:10; Hebrews 1:6; Revelation 4:10, 5:13-14). Heb. 1:6 is a quotation from Isaiah 45:23, and the eventuation of which we see in Revelation. Revelation 5:8 “And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.” Does the Bible allow the worship of an angel? Jesus sits on a throne of judgment. How many angels adjudicate in the matters of celestial assizes?


Horus and mother Isis

Osiris and Isis gave birth to Horus to complete the Egyptian form of trinitarian worship. Horus is deified as the second member of Egyptian worship. A blogger presents this (Osiris, Isis & Horus) as the original trinity. Definitely Metal Gaia does not have any information concerning Babel’s trinity of Nimrod, Semiramis and Tammuz, which, esoterically speaking, is the first duplication of the Trinity. The reading of Genesis 1:1-3 reveals the true Trinity. The fourth word of the first verse, ‘God’ is Elohiym, the plural of Eloahh! Verse two beams the light of scripture on the Holy Spirit. The Eternal Father spoke in verse three, on behalf of the Trinitarian Godhead, “Let there be light”. This is not a created light. The light of creationism came into being in the 14th verse. The Light of the 3rd verse is the True Light (John 1:1-14), Metal Gaia (blogger), take note please.

Ifa worshippers of Nigeria, Benin Republic and Brazil call the Creator Olodumare, which literally means ‘the owner of the oracle, the son of Àrè’. How is this so? Simple. Adam, no doubt, with his exceptional intelligence, should have known it and passed it to his offspring. Noah probably taught his children. It’s quite easy to have an idea passed down to another generation. Satan, who must continue to have man deceived, teaches the perversion of its idolatrous form to every generation. He’s been there before the creation of man.

Jesus of the Bible, evidently as a Spirit Being, wants to occupy our hearts. “Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him” (John 14:23). This is quite an incongruity with Roman Catholic Church’s love for the physical artwork of Jesus. Which Yeshua is this? John 4:24 says, “God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth”. The Spirit of regeneration dwells in our own spirit. The truth of Jesus is evidenced in the words of faith we speak in worship.

But some must put the supposedly ‘photograph’ of Jesus in their churches, homes and vehicles. Which Jesus is this? Demonic Jesus, of course!


Islam calls Him Issa. They know Him as one of the prophets (lower in rank to Mohammad), yet Qur’an calls him the word and spirit of Allah, “Behold! the angels said: “O Mary! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Messiah: Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honour in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah” 3:45. This is what Qur’an says in 4:171, “O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) a messenger of Allah, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him: so believe in Allah and His messengers.           (…to be concluded…)

read part two by clicking here



                               Jan Hus at stake, sentenced to death by the Catholicism of Vatican.

The sale of Indulgences, commonly regarded as a purchase of forgiveness and a permit to indulge in sin (pay now sin later programme) became a historic tradition in 1190. Christianity, as taught in the Bible, condemns such a traffic and it was the protest against this traffic that brought on the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century. Jan Hus, born in Husinec, Bohemia (now Czech Republic) in 1370, was burnt in July 6, 1415, for criticizing Catholicism.


Semiramis, Isis and Catholic Mary look, & are the  same

Exodus 20:4-5 read, (4) “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: 5) Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me”. Catholicism is clearly satanically motivated to continue in image worship. They could even swear not being culpable of the Second Commandment infringement. Rather than stopping the wrong thing, the Pope went ahead to expunge the 2nd Commandment to enable Catholics’ the joy of image worship. They still maintain the Ten by deceitfully dividing the 9th in two. Devil worship of Catholicism is an egregious display of spiritual irresponsibility. “We are not worshipping images, we’re only praying to God through them”, one woman told me, trying to explain it away. Who is fooling who?

The Romish Church opened the door too wide for evil incursion. Is the Vatican Church of Jesus? I doubt it! Last year, around the middle of 2015, Pope Francis spoke ex cathedra (i.e. infallibly as Jesus Christ would), telling the world that God had placed on his papal shoulders of the need to modify the Ten Commandments. The 7th will be removed (to enable God to shower love unto the inhuman carnal act of homosexualism). Two others will be added to make Eleven Commandments (which will cater for the exigencies of a modern 21st century). I thought it is crystal clear that God’s laws are eternally current! Definitely not Pope Francis, a Jesuit priest, after the order of Ignatius Loyola!




The entire earth is filled with religious ideas that originally started with the Babylonian leaders Nimrod, Tammuz and Semiramis.



It is clear that the woman of Eden, created perfectly, was not a weakling. One of the Hebraic meaning of ‘woman’, ishshah, is a circle – that surrounds her husband- making her his bodyguard. Why did she fall? She comes from a source, hence dependent. She is under instruction. Rather than exploit the power of her source and depend wholly on the instruction of her priestly Adam, she made a room in her heart to give an audience to the enemy. In the course of Satan’s discourse with her, the Devil initiated an unguarded utterance of, “neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die (Genesis 3:3).” And that was a deviation from the oracular protocol of Genesis 2:17, “But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” She began to long for an ungodly need and all the enemy had to do was simply to appeal to her needy stance.

The good LORD is never a melodramatist else I should hear Him stutter to show the graveness of His response of Genesis 3:11. He strolled in in His Majestic strides as the Lord of creation and as cool as cucumber and in consonance with the coolness of the day He asked calmly, “Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?” It was a catastrophic strike at the first Church. God’s earthly abode of the Garden of Eden ceased to function as the rendezvous of His worship for it was bereft of worshippers of the sanctuary. This is the saddest story of mankind.

“And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat (Genesis 3:6)”. The sanctuary incursion is caused by satanic projection. “When the woman saw”, is not the same thing as ‘what God made the woman to see’. The church leaders are made to see, by the enemy, what does not pertain to God’s visual projection. They warm up to it and the digestion of the devilish product is actually an initiation into Satanism. Is it not of what you consume into your system that you receive your growth? They agreed within their inner being that people will see this and come to church. It is what they see that is birthed: syncretic establishment, esoterically empowered miracles and unbiblical indoctrination. The fructification of the evil fruit is the attendant wisdom which was introduced. Satan’s wisdom is the craftiness of witchcraft which crept into the Church of God! (Concluded)

Click here to read part three.