Note the starry halo and the crescent beneath (Mary?). This is Semiramis or Queen Of Heaven of Catholicism.

Have you seen the halo depicting saintly purity around the heads of figures of the Catholicism veneration? Do you not know that it either symbolizes the sun or the wheel of a Babylonian god? It is pure idolatry. You cannot find it anywhere in depiction of a saint of the Almighty, biblically. Roman Catholic monstrance holding the Eucharist has a design of the crescent inside the sun to hold the type of wafer-god of Babylon within it, thereby depicting an exact duplicate of Babylonian worship of the sun-god BAAL. I do understand that these Vatican designs could just be a coincidental act from a love of aesthetic values. I am also absolutely not unaware of dozens of worship anomalies of Catholicism. The use of the crescent and the star is quite an ancient practice. They appear on coins and used in magical practices especially the masonic Star of David (which cannot be traced to Davidic or biblical historical verification).


                                                         Pictures do not lie or do they?

It is for this Catholic practice I find it expedient to make an allusion to St. Bernard story. Mary, it is believed, exposed her breast to Saint Bernard, (while nursing baby Jesus -who’s refused to be weaned?) and shot her breast milk into his eye. Presently, people say that while receiving milk from the ‘heavenly Mother’, Saint Bernard was initiated into supreme consciousness and adopted as the son of God and Mary. The more medieval wording was that Mary filled him with all divine graces and purified all his sins. Hence her title “Our Lady of All Graces”. How Christian is this? Let someone tell me.

satanic-pope-hexagram    The hexagram is Kabalistic.

Archaeological excavations and historical corroborations have proved that Mohammedan Allah has an ancient attachment to moon worship. Arabians, unlike the Nimrod’s Babel belief that the sun is the god, did worship moon as the god and the sun as his wife (I believe I know why the moon is an Islamic deciding factor!). The image of the star and the crescent came to my mind and in a flash, while in a Church service, and I saw it. The star is the sun (Nimrod, all over again) and the crescent is none other than the moon goddess Semiramis! Allah, etymologically, is of two: al (the) and illahu (generic word for god) words. Allah, the god, is, therefore, quite different from the Christian God, Jehovah. No wonder the Qur’an will neither make any mention of the covenant name, I AM THAT I AM nor Jerusalem (His venerated city of worship) and why the Bible will perforce exclude Allah. Okay, maybe it is another religious attempt appreciative of the Creator’s design of the heavenly bodies. Why venerate a Black stone which should be kissed any time of a hajj pilgrimage? The Old Testament, the part which Islam believes says, “Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am the LORD your God” [Leviticus 26:1]. So, please do tell me. Why do you have to march round the Kaaba, an ancient coven for 360 gods, including Allah and his three reputed goddesses? This is what Numbers 33:52 says, “Then ye shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down all their high places”. But we know the black stone, an idolatrous relic of his Quraysh tribesmen is a centre of Kaaba worship.


Mohammed got a prophecy from Allah concerning where to face when offering the five daily prayers. “Face the Ka’aba”, he instructed. “Kaaba is where the sun rises”, Moslems were educated. If you are in North America, North Africa or West Africa and you face the sun rising east you can be facing the Kaaba. Central and South African countries, Oman and U.A.E., as close as they are to Saudi Arabia will miss the Kaaba if they should face the east. If they should face the direction of the Kaaba, they will certainly be facing the west, the opposite of Qur’anic injunction. Does God, the Creator not have a good knowledge of geography? Russia, India, and all the countries to the East, including Australia and whole lots of Europe will be in trouble! The truth here is that Allah wants all Moslems to face his emblematic heavenly body, the sun. Sun worship. Period! Take a good look at the Mecca Mosque. Atop each minaret is a crescent. Call it a coincidence, but I can also see circular sun-like designs on the minaret!


Why must Roman Catholic use this in church service? It is a Catholic star & crescent adoption.

Exodus 23:32, “Thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor with their gods”. Deuteronomy 7:5, “But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire”. Exodus 23:24, “Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works: but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images”.


  If you doubt Islamic inclusion, this is its holiest shrine, the Mecca Mosque.

It is quite easy to have an idea passed down to another generation. Satan, who must continue to have man deceived, teaches his idolatrous ways to every generation. He has been there before the creation of man. And it is for this good grounds of Nimrod’s creation of idolatrous cosmos that we should tread cautiously in our bid to reach out to the LORD God, the Almighty. Nature should not be your consultant in the true worship of the Lord God. Amen! (Concluded)

Click here to read the 1st part.



    I will be like the Most High

Job 2:1-3 reads, “1) Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the LORD. 2 And the LORD said unto Satan, From whence comest thou? And Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it. 3 And the LORD said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil? and still he holdeth fast his integrity, although thou movedst me against him, to destroy him without cause.” ‘Sons’, in verse one is ben (bane), in Hebrew, meaning: ‘a child whose job is to build the family or home’. ‘Satan’ in Hebrew is śaṭan (saw-tawn’): {Origin: from śaṭan (saw-tan’) ‘to attack, (figuratively) accuse’} Strong’s Definition: ‘an opponent; especially (with the article prefixed) Satan, the arch enemy of good’. His stand before God is that of an adversary. He was no longer running errands for God again. He had become, as his itinerancy (…going to and fro in the earth…) evokes, a vagabond like Cain (Genesis 4:12), his first, true human disciple.

The word ‘considered’, leb (labe): ‘the heart; also used (figuratively) very widely for the feelings, the will and even the intellect’. Obviously, this degenerate Lucifer is so swallowed up in antipathy to be disposed to any capability of considering, in his heart, the pious stance of another creature. Satan is so morally bankrupt that his intelligence is perpetually headed towards paths of cruelty. This fallen angel is so incorrigibly antipathetic that he would not see what His Omniscience saw in Job! Let no religious indoctrination fool you into believing the reasonableness of a certain rapport between God and the Devil such that Satan can be or is still an angel (messenger) of the LORD God. That is an improbable possibility. The Devil did not and will never agree with God; he told God to His Omnipotence face, “…is it not because You have……that Job is…. (Job 1:9-11); and this is why he is called devil which, in Hebrew can be tsar, tsarar or śaṭan. The Greek calls it diabolos. Tsar (tsar) BDB Definition: ‘1. narrow, tight 2. straits, distress 3. adversary, foe, enemy, oppressor 4. hard pebble, flint’. Strong’s Definition: (as an adjective) narrow; (as a noun) a tight place (usually figuratively, that is, trouble); also a pebble (transitively) an opponent (as crowding)’.Tsarar (tsaw-rar’): ‘to cramp, literally or figuratively, transitively or intransitively’; and śaṭan (saw-tawn’): ‘an opponent; especially (with the article prefixed) Satan, the arch enemy of good’. Diabolos (dee-ab’-ol-os): ‘a traducer; specifically Satan’. The Devil’s preoccupation is to bastardize God’s prime workmanship: man. Be wise and tread not his path; keep your hands clean like that of Job.




                                                                       Lucifer is a sadist

Unlike Satan, God addressed Job as His servant because these qualities: ‘perfect, upright, feareth God, and escheweth evil’ are Job’s credentials, all of which Lucifer had become absolutely deficient. ‘Perfect’, tam (tawm) means: ‘complete; usually (morally) pious; specifically gentle, dear’. Lucifer’s piety received question marks when he vomited the infamy, “I will…”. ‘Upright’ is yashar (yaw-shawr’): ‘straight (literally or figuratively)’.Yashar comes from a root word: yashar (yaw-shar’): ‘to be straight or even; figuratively to be (causatively to make) right, pleasant, prosperous’. Is Satan fit, in any conceivable way, according to these definitions, to be in the holy God’s employment? ‘Feareth’ comes as yare’ (yaw-ray’): ‘fearing; morally reverent’. ‘Eschew’, Śur (soor): ‘to turn off (literally or figuratively)’. Satan is different, he is an avowed sadist.                    (…to be concluded…)

Read the part (I) here



Angelic host


In the beginning of time account of Genesis chapter one verse one, billions and maybe hundreds of billions of years ago, a masterpiece of an externality of beauty called Lucifer was brought into being, personally, by the Light: the Creator. This act of creating individuals personally by God is what makes angels ‘sons of God’. They received an original excellency, truth, holiness, purity, as well as dignity (Jude 6). Lucifer was the head of the angelic host as well as the leader of the praise and worship of the Most High. He is also the ‘light bearer’ as his name, Lucifer, means. Lucifer lost his estate when he willed (outside God’s dictum) to ascend into heaven, exalt his throne above the stars of God, and to sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north to receive a deified worship.


light bearer

                                                 Lucifer, the light bearer


Many times when a prophet comes under the afflatus, the spirit of prophecy veers him off the obvious to a hidden topic. A classic instance is found in, “12) Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty. 13) Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created. 14) Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. 15) Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee” Ezekiel 28:12-15. In Phoenicia, East of the Mediterranean, 20 miles South of Sidon is situated Tyre or Tyrus and the lamentation goes beyond that of her ruler. Even if the twelfth verse description fits the king of Tyrus, was he in Eden the garden of God? Did he have the adornment of the precious stones of sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold? Could he boast of the workmanship of tabrets and pipes prepared in him in the day that he was created like Lucifer? Definitely, this king of Tyrus cannot be the ‘anointed cherub that covereth’. Only the doomed Lucifer fits perfectly into this portrayal.

A few other verses of diversion are: Genesis 3:14 “And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life”: (& Genesis 3:15); Matthew 16:23, “But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men”. The spirit behind the meandrous ophidism is the same which councelled Peter in an unguarded speech of spiritual naivety. This evil entity has long severed spiritual relationship with Jehovah, the Creator.

“12) How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! 13) For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 14) I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. 15) Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. 16) They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; 17) That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?” Isaiah 14:12-17. The umbilical cord that depicts his filialness to the Creator became extinct. He became fatherless: a bastard, wanting of good source. A father to his evil self he assumed. He had lost an irrecoverable estate! (…to be continued…)

Read part (II) here.