An Ambassador (For Christ or Lucifer) -4th part

                                                                           T.B. JOSHUA- There’s no proof, no record of how and where he got born again.

 

  (Continued from the 3rd part)          Many are the churches that wear the guise of Pentecostalism to deceive people into their membership. The truth is that they are purely Satanic establishments. The leadership has been sent forth by demons to go and to preach another Jesus. They use the light of Satan to show people another gospel which is not another kind of the truth (Galatians 1:6, 7). All you have to do is listen carefully to their teachings, and because God has His way of exposing charlatans, the fake man of God will teach the wrong thing and will stubbornly defend falsehood even when you open the Bible, show and explain from the glaring point of scriptural understanding. These Pentecostal quacks will go into a fit of spiritual paroxysm, staging an uncontrollable effusion of new tongues. They have struck a cultic bargain which enables miraculous healing of diverse ailments and disfigured persons. The truth is that they themselves know that Jesus does not receive their spiritual trophies. Mormon Church has its own book of divine revelation. They teach from another bible. Another Jesus from another revelation with a promise of a different kind of salvation. Church of Satan, founded by Anton LaVey, never hid Satan as the source of his power. He had followers. He still has, even after his death, as his church flourishes with adherents. T.B. Joshua pastors a church where the chant of “EMMANUEL!” ushers him into the auditorium.

Helena P. Blavatsky

Helena P. Blavatsky was one of Lucifer’s most trusted ambassadors. Fritz Springmeier wrote about this woman in his famous book, ‘Be Wise As A Serpent’. Below is an excerpt: “Interestingly, the Theosophical Society feels that Freemasonry and itself teach the clear divine wisdom. H.P. Blavatsky, founder of the Theosophical Society tells us that the God of the Bible is “a tribal God and no more”<#55 Blavatsky, H.P. Collected Writings, Vol. 8. Theosophical Publishing House, p. 277> who is “capricious and unjust.”<#56 Blavatsky, H.P. The Key to Theosophy. Chicago: Theosophical Publishing House, 1930, p.111.> H.P.B. felt that Lucifer was the Savior of mankind and that the God of the Bible was really the adversary of man, hence the name Satan described God better than Lucifer. “The appellation Sa’tan, in Hebrew Satan, and Adversary…belongs by right to the first and cruelest “Adversary” of all other Gods—Jehovah; not to the serpent which spoke only words of sympathy and wisdom. “—Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3. Los Angeles: Theosophy Co., 1925, p. 386. H.P. Blavatsky, a Jewess, tells us, “Once the key to Genesis is in our hands, the scientific and symbolical Kabbala unveils the secret. The Great Serpent of the Garden of Eden and the “Lord God” are identical.”— The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2, p. 132. “Satan, the Serpent of Genesis is the real creator and benefactor, the Father of Spiritual mankind. For it is he…who opened the eyes [of Adam]…And he who was the first to whisper, “in the day ye eat thereof, ye shall be as Elohim, knowing good and evil,” can only be regarded in the light of a savior….he still remains in Esoteric Truth the ever loving messenger…who conferred on us spiritual instead of physical immortality.”—The Secret Doctrine, Vol.3, p.246.”

Another representative of Lucifer, Alice Ann Bailey (June 16, 1880 – December 15, 1949), a writer of more than twenty-four books on theosophical subjects, and was one of the first writers to use the term New Age. Her works, written between 1919 and 1949, describe a wide-ranging system of esoteric thought covering such topics as how spirituality relates to the solar system, meditation, healing, spiritual psychology, the destiny of nations, and prescriptions for society in general. She described the majority of her work as having been telepathically dictated to her by a Master of Wisdom, initially referred to only as “the Tibetan” or by the initials “D.K.,” later identified as Djwhal Khul. Her writings were somewhat similar to those of Madame Blavatsky and are among the teachings often referred to as the “Ageless Wisdom.” “Alice wrote over 65 years ago”, as posted by Pastor David Ogbueli, “Love has got a mysterious link called the love bond. It is like an ovum that comes out of the ovary, as it travels through your system, it clicks a love favour in you and there’s one other person in the world who can respond to that love bond, when you see that person, everything within you clicks, that is your man/woman, if you miss him, you’ll never be happy until that love bond cycles past, for many years, so for you to be happy get that person at whatever cost, if it means getting him/her out of that marriage, get him/her that is your man/woman. It’s a mistake for him/her to be elsewhere. And if you go together for some time and find that love has died, don’t be held in bondage by the Christian values it will never come back, what you need is an easily arranged divorce and allow another love bond to come forth, just like an ovum comes up, and when it comes forth you’ll enjoy life again”.

According to the pastor, Alice Bailey called for a change in curriculum to ensure that children are freed from the bondage of Christian culture. “If you take God out of education, they will unconsciously form a resolve that God is not necessary to face life. They will focus on those things the school counts them worthy to be passed on and they will look at God as an additional, if one can afford the additional”, was her submission. The resultant effect of Bailey’s many advocacies are the introduction of:

*Transcendental Meditation (TM) in schools which takes children to altered states of consciousness to meet with demons (spirit guides) = New Age.

*Prayer being taken out of American public schools (God’s own country!?)

*Break in the communication between parent and child to reduce parental control. This is to forestall Christian parents’ traditions being passed on to their children; to liberate children from the bondage of their parent traditions.

*It has promoted excessive child rights; (1997-1998 South Africa introduced Child rights legislation – UNICEF Charter. Today a child is able to say to parent ‘I do not want to hear that, I don’t want to do what you are telling me’. Teachers cannot talk to children, children step up and say, ‘I have my rights, you cannot talk to me like that’.

*Abolition of corporal punishment; (this has been made law). (…to be continued…)

 Read the 3^rd part, click here.

An Ambassador (For Christ or Lucifer) 3rd part

 

 

(Continued from the 2nd part)

The opening verse of Genesis 1:1, “In the beginning God created…” is a plurality proof of Persons in the Godhead. The Hebrew word for ‘God’ is ‘ĕlohıym (el-o-heem’): ‘gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates’. The singular for ĕlohıym is ĕloahh (el-o’-ah) ‘a deity or the Deity’. Ēloahh appears 57 times in the Old Testament; 52 times it is used in connection with the Almighty (i.e. an individual of the Trinity), and five times it is used in connection with a demonic idol. “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light” [Genesis 1:3]; these are the Words of God, the Eternal Father. HE is the First Member of the Godhead. The ‘Light’ is a Personage, the Second Member of the Godhead. John 1:1-14 expressly teaches the Deity of Jesus; verse 4, “In him was life; and the life was the light of men”. Verse 9, “That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.” Genesis 1:2, “And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters”. The word ‘moved’ in Hebrew is rachaph (raw-khaf’): ‘to brood; by implication to be relaxed’. The ‘brood’ is actually a picture of a mother bird. The Holy Spirit was energizing the earth for Christ’s creationism. The solemn promise of Jesus in John 14:26, “But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you”, is a proof of the Omniscience of the Holy Spirit. Who else but God can teach all things? The word, ‘Comforter’ is, paraklētos (par-ak’-lay-tos): ‘An intercessor, consoler’. Can a neuter object be a paraklētos, as defined? Check this one out in Acts 13:2, “As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted, the Holy Ghost said, Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them”. Can a lifeless intangibility say words? Note the personalization. The word ‘called’ is proskaleomai (pros-kal-eh’-om-ahee) ‘to call toward oneself, that is, summon, invite‘. In the Holy of Holies, only the high priest can enter that place and it must be once in a year, and with visible blood in his hands. What makes the place so sacred is the Divine, personal presence of the Holy Spirit, receiving all the worship and the sacrifices, as the Jehovah God of Israel. This is the Third Member of the Godhead. Can somebody see clearly that Jehovah’s Witness people are not ambassadors for the true Christ?

 

 Roland Obu & father Olumba Olumba Obu

 White garment churches e.g. Olumba Olumba Obu’s founded “Brotherhood of the Cross and Star”, “Cherubim & Seraphim” of Moses Orimolade, “Celestial Church of Christ” founded by S.B.J. Oshoffa to mention a few, from all indications cannot claim to be true churches of Jesus Christ. Members’ white, church uniform finds its scriptural reliance on Revelation 3:4; 3:5; 6:11; 7:9; 7:13; 7:14; 19:14. “Angels wear white” they make it very clear. So, I ask whether they have already made it to heaven as Rev 7:14, “These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb”, states. Are there fashion designing tailors and seamstresses in heaven, and who sews the earthly theirs to give it a celestial prominence?

    Does the white make them righteous?

  None of the Bible prophets, writers or the apostles ever taught the wearing of any spiritual garment for worshippers. What Jesus said in John 4:24 is, “God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth”. They must not, as a rule, put on any footwear into the church auditorium because of what the Lord told Moses (in Exodus 3:5), and Joshua (in Joshua 5:15). “And he said, Draw not nigh hither: put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground” (Exodus 3:5). Two things: Draw not nigh hither; and put off thy shoes. So, why do they draw nigh into the church auditorium? The putting off of shoes was just to arrest his attention. In the first ever Passover ritual that enhanced the victorious departure from Egypt the instruction was, “And thus shall ye eat it; with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and ye shall eat it in haste: it is the LORD’S passover” [Exodus 12:11]. Someone opined that maybe it was because they were in a hurry to leave Egypt. I ask, “How long does it take to wear sandals and would God ever bend His holy rules?

 

Photos top left is  Moses Orimolade, bottom left is S.B.J. Oshoffa

on the right is  Prophet Adetunji Adeonigbagbe of Celica Church of Christ.                                                      

When the lead role star of the prodigal son parable came back home, the paraphernalia of his justification and restoration was found in Luke 15:22, “But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet“. In Exodus chapter 19 where Moses was told to prepare Israelites for God’s physical visitation and the 20th when the Eternal Visitant did show up, there was no mention of removal of shoes before His holy presence. You cannot find anywhere in the New Testament where footwears are forbidden in a Christian worship. The white garment churches are usually headed by a prophet (which reminds me of the prophets of the antichrist) but we know that a pastor is the New Testament shepherd of a local assembly. I do not know of any of their services where an altar call is made. They do not get people born again! Ambassadors of Lucifer. The deliverance services of white garment churches speak fetish volumes. They use candles, soaps, sponges, eggs, oil, and in dire cases, the spirit of their prophetic oracle demands blood sacrifice! They (C.C.C.) begin prayers thus: “Jah! Jah! Jah! Jesus Christ! Holy Michael!” Some invoke ‘holy Uriel’ and ‘holy Raphael’ -unscriptural angels. Olumba declared in his teachings, “I am the Holy Spirit”. It is believed that he is dead; it would not, or shall I say, “shouldn’t be made public”, for how does one go about the obituary of the Holy Spirit? (…to be continued…)

Read the ^2nd part here

An Ambassador (For Christ or Lucifer) -2nd part

 

 

(Continued from the 1st part)   The truth is that when you use falsity to teach Jesus Christ you will definitely expose yourself with your very stance. Mariolatry points so effortlessly to Prophet Jeremiah’s condemnation of ‘the queen of heaven’ in Jeremiah 7:18; 44:17-19; 44:25 and Pauline allusion to the terrible jealousy of God we ignite by this sinful act in 1Corinthians 10:22, “Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he?” This incorrigible opiumism of Catholicism to Mariology leaves us no room but to understand who her ambassadorial missiology rightly serves. It may be of interest to note that this ‘queen of heaven’ is a religious reference to the moon. The demonic entity behind it is Ashtoreth or Astarte, the wife of Baal (sun god). Understand also that the first man to lead the earthly propagation of idolatry after the great deluge was Nimrod, who was worshipped as bel or baal and as the sun god. His wife, Semiramis was the one the Phoelignician worshippers called the moon i.e. Ashtoreth or Astarte: the wife of Baal or Moloch, the king of heaven. To them the male and female pair of deities symbolized the generative (most probably where Illuminati get their ‘G’ symbol) powers of nature; hence arose the introduction of prostitution in the worship.

The Babylonians worshipped Ashtoreth as Mylitta, that is, generative. Our Monday, or Moon-day, indicates the former prevalence of moon worship and the Bible says in Isaiah 65:11, “But ye are they that forsake the LORD, that forget my holy mountain, that prepare a table for that troop, and that furnish the drink offering unto that number”. Talk about concupiscence, maybe it is the spirit of Astarte that accounts for priests’ randiness. The invocation of Mary as the mediatrix certainly exhumes and imports an unscriptural Semiramis into Christianity. It is as simple as that. Was it the Holy Spirit that told the Pope to carry out an expunction of the second commandment in an expurgatory exercise? Definitely the 2nd law of, “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: v. 5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me” [Exodus 20:4-5]; is offensive to Romish indoctrinating penchant love for the adoration of artwork. Apostolic Succession is another scriptural anomaly from Catholicism. If they teach that every Pope is a successor of Peter, who succeeded Paul, Matthew, James, Bartholomew, John, Thaddeus, Philip and the other apostles, or are they not apostles of the Lord Jesus?

  Pope Francis

 

The Pope, as the head of the Roman Catholic Church, is often called the “Holy Father” and the “Vicar of Christ”. These titles and roles only find an application to God. As “Holy Father”, he is God the Father or Christ (as found in Isaiah 9:6). “Vicar of Christ” makes the pope Christ (as coming from the Father) or the Holy Spirit (the Comforter). This guy is calling himself God, the Creator, just as others before him! He claims the ability to speak ex cathedra, which implies that the pope exercises a Godlike infallibility which enables him to add to and augment Scripture. What! I am flabbergasted, overwhelmed and completely nonplussed at the reckless impunity with which Catholicism treats the Word of God, well maybe no pope ever read Revelation 22:18-20, where we have in the 18th verse, “For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book”.

The word ‘testify’ contextually is different from the ‘testifieth’ of the 20th verse. Testify is summartureō (soom-mar-too-reh’-o): ‘to testify jointly, that is, corroborate by (concurrent) evidence’. This summartureō is applied to John as an ambassador for Christ. ‘Testifieth’ of the 20th verse is martureō (mar-too-reh’-o): ‘to be a witness, that is, testify (literally or figuratively)’. Martureō in this context is in connection with the true or original Testifier Himself, the Word of God, even the Lord Jesus. The Roman Catholic Pope wields unbiblical and unholy authority over his followers, usurping the headship of Christ and perverting the work of the Holy Spirit.

Charles Taze Russell of Jehovah’s Witness

All that Jehovah’s Witness sect saw in the Bible is the Book of 1Thessalonians 4:16, “For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first”; to make an angelic conclusion of Christ. The title, ‘Lord’ in Greek is kurios (koo’-ree-os): ‘From κυρος kuros (supremacy); supreme in authority, that is, (as noun) controller’. This is a Greek title very similar to the Hebrew ‘Jehovah’. “For the Lord himself shall descend…” is an emphatic statement of God intimation. The word ‘shout’ is keleuma (kel’-yoo-mah): ‘a cry of incitement, an order, command, spec. a stimulating cry, either that by which animals are roused and urged on by man, as horses by charioteers, hounds by hunters etc.’. The Lord Jesus gives an order and the archangel (possibly, Michael) responds with a ‘voice’ which is phōnē (fo-nay’): ‘through the idea of disclosure; ‘a tone (articulate, bestial or artificial); by implication an address (for any purpose), saying or language’. The archangel echoes the Lord’s command. Two people (The Lord and His creature) verbalize the same thing. Charles Taze Russell either did not understand or just wanted to teach the wrong doctrine. Russell taught that the Holy Spirit was just an inanimate intangibility and that the doctrine of the Trinity is of the occult. (…to be continued…)

Read 1^st part by clicking here

An Ambassador (For Christ or Lucifer) (1st part)

The LORD God formed Adam and brought the Woman to him (for a marriage) to create an ambassadorial family for Christ on earth. God successfully established His most guarded secret: the Church. The Church, and she alone, speaks on behalf of God.

Adam, by this virtue, became the first prophet, priest and ambassador of God’s earthly affairs. Lucifer took a good look at the first couple for some days or years and concluded (like he has, concerning millions still) that it is through the Woman (emblematic of the Church) he could gain an inroad into the world so that he too would have an ambassador in the affairs of terra firma. The woman played an insubordination game by misrepresenting her head i.e. husband. This created an evil opening for an operative representation for Satan. The evil one needed a true and loyal spokesman, which he could not get the Woman to be, for she decided to keep her marriage (to the Lamb) intact. A most willing Cain became Lucifer’s first ambassador; he went to live in a place called Nod, which means ‘vagrancy’ answering to his new status as a vagabond. Cain became a man personally trained in the missiology of acquiring spiritual fugitives for Satan’s kingdom. This man named his city after his first child, Enoch, which means ‘initiate’ for: every member of any secret society must go through a covenanted initiation. Lucifer could not get the Woman, whom Christ already had. To have his own false church of satanic worship a woman was inevitable so what did he do? He married the man (Cain) –spiritually – which engendered homosexuality.

 

Nimrod, the hunter: of men. Satan’s ambassador

 

Cain chose the east of Eden because the east is where the sun rises. Satan has no light so he uses the sun as an object of his worship. Sun worship is a representation of Satanism, which gained global prominence under Nimrod, a hunter of the blood of men, his name means ‘rebellion’. The hallo that is drawn on the head of ‘saints’ and the Eucharist with the sun seen in Roman Catholic Church are ambassadorial elements of Luciferian worship. Any religious call for rites is perfected by the ambassadors of Satan. Was Mohammad Jehovah’s ambassador? Krishna, Confucius, Tao, Ifa, Baal, Ashtoreth, Tammuz and the other ambassadors of religions, which of them spoke for Jesus? Without Christ, the 2nd Member of the Godhead, there can never be an ambassadorial office for heavenly paradise. Mohammed was an oracle of the Arabic Allah. He saw Jesus as one of the prophets of an Allah, unknown to Jesus, the express Word of God. The Islamic Qur’an (chapters 3:45; 4:157, 171, 172; 5:17, 72, 75; 9:30, 31) agrees with the Messianic office of Jesus but Mohammed never called Him the Saviour.

 

 

Buddha, Tao and Confucius were probably contemporaries. A good study of their teachings are mere philosophical didacticism and that which never gave a clear cut soteriological procedure. Books of esotericism and of the paths to spiritual advancement especially through rituals are their selling points. Ifa of Yoruba and Brazilians is a worshipped idol. Ifa oracle is communed through demonic entities to its adherents. It has a form of Jesus, not unlike all religions. Baal, Ashtoreth, Tammuz are creations of Nimrod’s ambassadorial missionary for the cause of Satan’s church. Tammuz, according to Baal worship, is wept for, on a particular night (a tradition that is a commemorative ritual of his death) by women, who went on a ritualistic whoring, as they await his traditional coming, the following day, which they celebrate with jubilation. Does that not imitate Jesus? Words play a crucial role in all religions for: Satan understands that the Second Member of the Godhead is the Word of the Divinity. Ifa worshippers call the Creator ‘Olodumare’ a shortened form of ‘Olodu omo Are’ meaning ‘the oracle, the son of Are (pronounced: a-ray)’. A form of Christ, is it not?

One hundred and twenty years was what it took Noah, preaching to every living person (children inclusive!), in the antediluvian age, to serve as an ambassador for Christ. Noah pleased his Creator, Jesus Christ. Noah means ‘rest’. His obedient walk with God brought respite to a condemned humanity. “For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness” [Romans 4:3]. Abraham was a very good ambassador who prepared his descendant successors’ victorious walk of handling the patriarchal baton. The passing of the baton that eventually birthed the chosen nation of Israel which prophetically paved the way of the inevitable feat of the Incarnation.

 

                    

How do these guys think? Do they look gay? Whose ambassadors are they?

 

Concerning man, the Bible says, “For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he” [Proverbs 23:7]. The word ‘thinketh’ is sha‛ar (shaw-ar’) BDB Definition: ‘to split open, reason out, calculate, reckon, estimate, to calculate’. Strong’s Definition: ‘to split or open, that is, to act as gate keeper (figuratively) to estimate’ {it gives a picture of sha‛ar (shah’-ar): ‘an opening, that is, door or gate’ or sho‛er (sho-are’) gatekeeper, porter or a janitor’}. Those who display divergent, scriptural doctrines run ambassadorial errand for Lucifer, the fallen angel who must receive obeisant adoration. They do not think, enter or keep the gate of the gospel of Jesus. Roman Catholic has consistently proved to be incorrigible in her stubborn exegesis of unscriptural doctrines. Their doctrine on Mariology teaches Mary’s status as queen of the celestial angels which culminates in Mariolatry. If, as they teach their unsuspecting billions of adherents, Mary is the mother of God that, no doubt, makes her a goddess in the heavenly assizes, seated on her own throne and receiving an everlasting angelic obeisant adoration!                                (…to be continued…)

Divine Eulogy

 

When you worship God with, “You are the King of kings”, you are merely verbalizing an obviousness. Does the Bible not say so in Psalms 29:10, 93:1, 145:13, 146:10; Isaiah 6:1, 33:22; Jeremiah 10:10, 17:12; Lamentations 5:19; Ezekiel 1:26, 10:1; Daniel 4:34, 7:9; 1Timothy 1:17, 6:15, 6:16; Hebrews 8:1; Revelation 3:21, 4:5, 4:9, 5:1, 5:6; 5:7, 5:13, 6:16, 7:9-17, 12:5, 17:14, 19:4, 21:5, 22:1-3? 1Timothy 6:15-16 says, “Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords; (v.16) Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen”. Need I expatiate on this verse in which God the Father is: a) the only Potentate (dunastēs [doo-nas’-tace]: ‘ruler with great authoritative power of dominance’); b) King of kings & c) Who only hath immortality (no other god of idolatry has a life eternal. In Rev 17:14, “These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful”, this Lamb is Jesus, the Son. And this is a proof of Divine co-equality shared by Both.

For those who sing the declaration of God as, “far above all”, they have not told any lies. Scriptures of Ephesians 4:6, 4:10; Philippians 2:9-11; 1Peter 3:22 and Revelation 5:9-13 authenticate their submission. The mind of God has been explored and mined and the scriptures given above display the nuggets of the truthfulness of their explorations. Ephesians 4:6, “One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all”. Ephesians 4:10, “He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.” Again while the sixth verse is a reference to the First Member of the Godhead, the tenth affirms an Omnipresence: of the Son. You cannot worship the Father in an isolation of the Son and certainly not in the rejection of the energizing power of the Holy Spirit.

 

 

                                                    

 

ls God truly what you said in the effusion of “He is my all in all”? 1Corinthians 12:6; 15:28; Ephesians 1:23 and Colossians 3:11 vindicate your claims (for your information). 1Corinthians 15:28 says, “And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.”

I hear the saints of Jesus, night and morning, call our God “the Most High”. In the Books of Genesis 14:18; Numbers 24:16; Deuteronomy 32:8; 2Samuel 22:14; Psalms 7:17, 21:7, 92:1; Isaiah 14:14; Daniel 3:26; Hosea 7:16; Mark 5:17; Acts 7:48 and Hebrews 7:1 are the proofs of attestations. What does 2Samuel 22:14 say? “The LORD thundered from heaven, and the most High uttered his voice.” We do have Psalm 21:7, as it agrees with, “For the king trusteth in the LORD, and through the mercy of the most High he shall not be moved”.

Most veracious I find it when He is declared as the Saviour. Deuteronomy 32:4, 15; 2Samuel 22:47; Psalms 18:46, 89:26 and 95:1 acquiescently endorse the salvific truism. In the famous Psalm 23 we have, “He restoreth my soul:” in verse three. ‘Restoreth’ is shub (shoob), meaning: ‘to return, turn back or bring back’ (definitely from destruction in hell). Psalm 95:1, “O come, let us sing unto the LORD: let us make a joyful noise to the rock of our salvation”, points to Jehovah as the Saviour.

 

 

 

 

As tears of sadness stream down his masculine cheeks he kept believing God with the faithful words of, “You can do all things”, even after waiting for years. Check these scriptures: Numbers 11:23; 1Samuel 14:6; Job 36:5, 42:2; Jeremiah 32:17; Matthew 3:7, 19:26; Luke 1:13, 37; Ephesians 3:20; Philippians 3:21, 4:13 and understand that he is not gone around the bend and that he has been calling on the right Person. Jeremiah 32:17, “Ah Lord GOD! behold, thou hast made the heaven and the earth by thy great power and stretched out arm, and there is nothing too hard for thee”.

 

 

 

Honestly speaking, the assertive, “There is none like Him” has scriptural backing in Exodus 15:11; Deuteronomy 3:24; Psalms 86:8, 89:6, 9; Isaiah 40:18, 25; Jeremiah 10:6,7 and Daniel 3:29. This is what Isaiah 40:18 says, “To whom then will ye liken God? or what likeness will ye compare unto him?” The word ‘liken’ is damah (daw-maw’): ‘to be like, resemble, compare, to imagine, think’. The Hebrew for ‘likeness’ is demuth (dem-ooth’) BDB Definition: ‘similitude (noun feminine) like, as (adverb)’. Strong’s Definition: ‘resemblance; concretely model, shape; adverbially like’. ‘Compare’ is the Hebrew word ‛arak (aw-rak’): ‘to arrange, set or put or lay in order, set in array’. This verse is a rhetorical question. When you place God side by side all notable entities and phenomena, your good sense of judgment will discover that, with the exception of Jehovah, the God of the Bible, all others are the products of creationism.

 

 

 

 

THE SANCTUARY INCURSION (part four)

                               Jan Hus at stake, sentenced to death by the Catholicism of Vatican.

The sale of Indulgences, commonly regarded as a purchase of forgiveness and a permit to indulge in sin (pay now sin later programme) became a historic tradition in 1190. Christianity, as taught in the Bible, condemns such a traffic and it was the protest against this traffic that brought on the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century. Jan Hus, born in Husinec, Bohemia (now Czech Republic) in 1370, was burnt in July 6, 1415, for criticizing Catholicism.

Semiramis, Isis and Catholic Mary look, & are the  same

Exodus 20:4-5 read, (4) “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: 5) Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me”. Catholicism is clearly satanically motivated to continue in image worship. They could even swear not being culpable of the Second Commandment infringement. Rather than stopping the wrong thing, the Pope went ahead to expunge the 2nd Commandment to enable Catholics’ the joy of image worship. They still maintain the Ten by deceitfully dividing the 9th in two. Devil worship of Catholicism is an egregious display of spiritual irresponsibility. “We are not worshipping images, we’re only praying to God through them”, one woman told me, trying to explain it away. Who is fooling who?

The Romish Church opened the door too wide for evil incursion. Is the Vatican Church of Jesus? I doubt it! Last year, around the middle of 2015, Pope Francis spoke ex cathedra (i.e. infallibly as Jesus Christ would), telling the world that God had placed on his papal shoulders of the need to modify the Ten Commandments. The 7th will be removed (to enable God to shower love unto the inhuman carnal act of homosexualism). Two others will be added to make Eleven Commandments (which will cater for the exigencies of a modern 21st century). I thought it is crystal clear that God’s laws are eternally current! Definitely not Pope Francis, a Jesuit priest, after the order of Ignatius Loyola!

 

 

The entire earth is filled with religious ideas that originally started with the Babylonian leaders Nimrod, Tammuz and Semiramis.

 

 

It is clear that the woman of Eden, created perfectly, was not a weakling. One of the Hebraic meaning of ‘woman’, ishshah, is a circle – that surrounds her husband- making her his bodyguard. Why did she fall? She comes from a source, hence dependent. She is under instruction. Rather than exploit the power of her source and depend wholly on the instruction of her priestly Adam, she made a room in her heart to give an audience to the enemy. In the course of Satan’s discourse with her, the Devil initiated an unguarded utterance of, “neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die (Genesis 3:3).” And that was a deviation from the oracular protocol of Genesis 2:17, “But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” She began to long for an ungodly need and all the enemy had to do was simply to appeal to her needy stance.

The good LORD is never a melodramatist else I should hear Him stutter to show the graveness of His response of Genesis 3:11. He strolled in in His Majestic strides as the Lord of creation and as cool as cucumber and in consonance with the coolness of the day He asked calmly, “Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?” It was a catastrophic strike at the first Church. God’s earthly abode of the Garden of Eden ceased to function as the rendezvous of His worship for it was bereft of worshippers of the sanctuary. This is the saddest story of mankind.

“And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat (Genesis 3:6)”. The sanctuary incursion is caused by satanic projection. “When the woman saw”, is not the same thing as ‘what God made the woman to see’. The church leaders are made to see, by the enemy, what does not pertain to God’s visual projection. They warm up to it and the digestion of the devilish product is actually an initiation into Satanism. Is it not of what you consume into your system that you receive your growth? They agreed within their inner being that people will see this and come to church. It is what they see that is birthed: syncretic establishment, esoterically empowered miracles and unbiblical indoctrination. The fructification of the evil fruit is the attendant wisdom which was introduced. Satan’s wisdom is the craftiness of witchcraft which crept into the Church of God! (Concluded)

Click here to read part three.